Kyozaire J K, Veary C M, Petzer I M, Donkin E F
Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa.
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2005 Jun;76(2):69-73. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v76i2.400.
In order to determine the safety of milk produced by smallholder dairy goat farms, a farm-based research study was conducted on commercial dairy goat farms to compare the microbiological quality of milk produced using 3 different types of dairy goat production systems (intensive, semi-intensive and extensive). A survey of dairy goat farms in and around Pretoria carried out by means of a questionnaire revealed that most of the smallholder dairy goat farms surveyed used an extensive type of production system. The method of milking varied with the type of production system, i.e. machine milking; bucket system machine milking and hand-milking, respectively. Udder half milk samples (n=270) were analysed, of which 31.1% were infected with bacteria. The lowest intra-mammary infection was found amongst goats in the herd under the extensive system (13.3%), compared with 43.3% and 36.7% infection rates under the intensive and semi-intensive production systems, respectively. Staphylococcus intermedius (coagulase positive), Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus simulans (both coagulase negative), were the most common cause of intramammary infection with a prevalence of 85.7% of the infected udder halves. The remaining 14.3% of the infection was due to Staphylococcus aureus. Bacteriology of bulk milk samples on the other hand, showed that raw milk obtained by the bucket system milking machine had the lowest total bacterial count (16,450 colony forming units (CFU)/ml) compared to that by pipeline milking machine (36,300 CFU/ml) or hand-milking (48,000 CFU/ml). No significant relationship was found between the somatic cell counts (SCC) and presence of bacterial infection in goat milk In comparison with the herds under the other 2 production systems, it was shown that dairy goat farming under the extensive production system, where hand-milking was used, can be adequate for the production of safe raw goat milk.
为了确定小农户奶山羊场生产的牛奶的安全性,在商业化奶山羊场开展了一项基于农场的研究,以比较使用3种不同奶山羊生产系统(集约化、半集约化和粗放型)生产的牛奶的微生物质量。通过问卷调查对比勒陀利亚及其周边的奶山羊场进行的一项调查显示,接受调查的大多数小农户奶山羊场采用的是粗放型生产系统。挤奶方法因生产系统类型而异,分别为机器挤奶、桶式系统机器挤奶和手工挤奶。对270份乳房半侧牛奶样本进行了分析,其中31.1%受到细菌感染。在粗放型系统下的畜群中,山羊的乳房内感染率最低(13.3%),而集约化和半集约化生产系统下的感染率分别为43.3%和36.7%。中间葡萄球菌(凝固酶阳性)、表皮葡萄球菌和模仿葡萄球菌(均为凝固酶阴性)是乳房内感染的最常见原因,在受感染的乳房半侧中患病率为85.7%。其余14.3%的感染是由金黄色葡萄球菌引起的。另一方面,混合牛奶样本的细菌学检测表明,与管道式挤奶机(36,300个菌落形成单位(CFU)/毫升)或手工挤奶(48,000 CFU/毫升)相比,桶式系统挤奶机获得的生牛奶的细菌总数最低(16,450 CFU/毫升)。在山羊奶中,体细胞计数(SCC)与细菌感染的存在之间未发现显著关系。与其他两种生产系统下的畜群相比,结果表明,在使用手工挤奶的粗放型生产系统下进行奶山羊养殖,足以生产安全的生山羊奶。