Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷与冠状动脉搭桥手术后出血

Clopidogrel and bleeding after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

作者信息

Leong Jee-Yoong, Baker Robert A, Shah Pallav J, Cherian Vijit K, Knight John L

机构信息

Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.074.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that clopidogrel (with or without aspirin) confers superior outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study is to review the effect of preoperative clopidogrel administration on clinical outcome, bleeding complications and resource utilization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

METHODS

Patient data were prospectively collected from 919 patients who had isolated coronary surgery during the period 2000 to 2003. Outcome comparisons were studied, firstly between patients who received preoperative clopidogrel with those who did not, and secondly between patients on clopidogrel only, aspirin only, both or neither medications.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (2.6%) were on clopidogrel only, 598 (65.1%) were on aspirin only, 61 (6.6%) were on both, and 236 (25.7%) were on neither. Clopidogrel (n = 85) versus no clopidogrel (n = 834): there were no significant differences in the off-pump patients. In the on-pump patients, the clopidogrel group had significantly increased bleeding (p = 0.02), blood transfused (p = 0.01), intensive care (p = 0.03), and hospital stays (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in surgical reexploration, perioperative myocardial infarction, intraoperative balloon pump use, inotropic support or 30-day mortality. Clopidogrel versus aspirin versus both versus neither: patients on both clopidogrel and aspirin had significantly more postoperative bleeding than patients on aspirin alone or on neither medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative use of clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery showed limited clinical benefits; however, its use significantly increased the risk of bleeding, blood transfusion, and resource utilization.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,氯吡格雷(无论是否联用阿司匹林)可使冠心病患者获得更好的预后。本研究旨在探讨冠状动脉搭桥手术后,术前使用氯吡格雷对临床结局、出血并发症及资源利用情况的影响。

方法

前瞻性收集了2000年至2003年期间919例接受单纯冠状动脉手术患者的数据。首先比较了术前接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者与未接受该治疗的患者的结局,其次比较了仅使用氯吡格雷、仅使用阿司匹林、两者联用或两者均未使用的患者的结局。

结果

24例患者(2.6%)仅使用氯吡格雷,598例患者(65.1%)仅使用阿司匹林,61例患者(6.6%)两者联用,236例患者(25.7%)两者均未使用。氯吡格雷组(n = 85)与未使用氯吡格雷组(n = 834):非体外循环患者中无显著差异。在体外循环患者中,氯吡格雷组的出血(p = 0.02)、输血(p = 0.01)、重症监护(p = 0.03)及住院时间(p = 0.03)均显著增加。手术再次探查、围手术期心肌梗死、术中球囊泵使用、血管活性药物支持或30天死亡率方面无显著差异。氯吡格雷组、阿司匹林组、两者联用组及两者均未使用组:同时使用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的患者术后出血明显多于仅使用阿司匹林或两者均未使用的患者。

结论

冠状动脉搭桥手术患者术前使用氯吡格雷的临床获益有限;然而,其使用显著增加了出血、输血及资源利用的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验