Bast Robert C, Lilja Hans, Urban Nicole, Rimm David L, Fritsche Herbert, Gray Joe, Veltri Robert, Klee George, Allen Andrew, Kim Nam, Gutman Steven, Rubin Mark A, Hruszkewycz Andrew
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 1;11(17):6103-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2213.
A group of investigators met at a Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Workshop to discuss key issues in the translation of biomarker discovery to the development of useful laboratory tests for cancer care. Development and approval of several new markers and technologies have provided informative examples that include more specific markers for prostate cancer, more sensitive tests for ovarian cancer, more objective analysis of tissue architecture and an earlier indication of response to treatment in breast cancer. Although there is no clear paradigm for biomarker development, several principles are clear. Marker development should be driven by clinical needs, including early cancer detection, accurate pretreatment staging, and prediction of response to treatment, as well as monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. Development of a national repository that uses carefully preserved, well-annotated tissue specimens will facilitate new marker development. Reference standards will be an essential component of this process. Both hospital-based and commercial laboratories can play a role in developing biomarkers from discovery to test validation. Partnering of academe and industry should occur throughout the process of biomarker development. The National Cancer Institute is in a unique position to bring together academe, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration to (a) define clinical needs for biomarkers by tumor type, (b) establish analytic and clinical paradigms for biomarker development, (c) discuss ways in which markers from different companies might be evaluated in combination, (d) establish computational methods to combine data from multiple biomarkers, (e) share information regarding promising markers developed in National Cancer Institute-supported programs, and (f) exchange data regarding new platforms and techniques that can accelerate marker development.
一组研究人员在卓越研究专项计划研讨会上齐聚一堂,讨论生物标志物发现转化为用于癌症治疗的实用实验室检测方法过程中的关键问题。几种新标志物和技术的开发与获批提供了丰富的实例,包括更具特异性的前列腺癌标志物、更敏感的卵巢癌检测方法、对组织结构更客观的分析以及乳腺癌治疗反应的早期指标。尽管生物标志物开发尚无明确的范例,但有几条原则是明确的。标志物开发应由临床需求驱动,包括早期癌症检测、准确的治疗前分期、治疗反应预测,以及疾病进展监测和治疗反应监测。建立一个使用精心保存、注释完善的组织标本的国家储存库将有助于新标志物的开发。参考标准将是这一过程的重要组成部分。医院实验室和商业实验室在从生物标志物发现到检测验证的整个过程中都可以发挥作用。学术界和产业界应在生物标志物开发的全过程中开展合作。美国国立癌症研究所处于独特的地位,能够将学术界、产业界和美国食品药品监督管理局汇聚在一起,以便:(a)按肿瘤类型确定生物标志物的临床需求;(b)建立生物标志物开发的分析和临床范例;(c)讨论如何联合评估不同公司的标志物;(d)建立整合多种生物标志物数据的计算方法;(e)分享国立癌症研究所支持项目中开发的有前景的标志物的信息;(f)交流有关可加速标志物开发的新平台和新技术的数据。