Ofer N, Baumeister S, Ohlbauer M, Germann G, Sauerbier M
Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie-Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, 67071 Ludwigshafen.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Aug;37(4):245-55. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865801.
Free tissue transplantation is a rarely indicated procedure in burn reconstruction. As the versatility and variability of free flaps have significantly increased during recent years, so too have the indications for these procedures expanded.
We retrospectively report the results of 42 free flaps for upper extremity reconstruction in 35 severely burned patients using 13 different free flaps. This experience has enabled us to establish reconstructive principles pertinent to the type of injury (burn versus high voltage injuries) and the timing of reconstruction procedures.
In high voltage injuries (n = 17) early free flap coverage (< 21 days after trauma) with muscular flaps was the most frequently used type of reconstruction. Reconstruction site was predominately the forearm. In burn injuries (flame, contact, fluid), free flap coverage was performed during a later stage of the treatment course (3 to 6 weeks after trauma), or as a secondary procedure. Reconstruction with cutaneous or fascial flaps was the preferred method. The elbow and the dorsum of the hand underwent defect coverage in most circumstances. For the reconstruction of complex or large defects (n = 6) combined "chimeric" flaps, preexpansion of free flaps, or the combination of a free and local flap were used. Overall, the flap failure rate was 12 % (n = 5). Interestingly, there was a relationship between flap failure rate and timing of the procedure. Four out of five flap failures occurred within 5 to 21 days after trauma, all five flap failures occurred between five days and six weeks. No flap failure was seen during secondary reconstruction.
Our data demonstrate that burn and high voltage injuries are distinct entities, each requiring custom-tailored reconstructive solutions for limb salvage. Even if our flap failures all occurred during the first six weeks it should not be forgotten that this type of coverage is the only alternative to amputation in selective cases.
在烧伤重建中,游离组织移植是一种很少采用的手术方式。近年来,随着游离皮瓣的多功能性和可变性显著增加,这些手术的适应证也有所扩大。
我们回顾性报告了35例严重烧伤患者采用13种不同游离皮瓣进行上肢重建的42例游离皮瓣手术结果。该经验使我们能够确立与损伤类型(烧伤与高压电损伤)及重建手术时机相关的重建原则。
在高压电损伤(n = 17)中,早期(创伤后<21天)采用肌皮瓣进行游离皮瓣覆盖是最常用的重建方式。重建部位主要是前臂。在烧伤(火焰伤、接触伤、液体伤)中,游离皮瓣覆盖在治疗后期(创伤后3至6周)进行,或作为二期手术。采用皮瓣或筋膜瓣重建是首选方法。在大多数情况下,肘部和手背进行缺损覆盖。对于复杂或大面积缺损(n = 6)的重建,采用联合“嵌合”皮瓣、游离皮瓣预扩张或游离皮瓣与局部皮瓣联合的方法。总体而言,皮瓣失败率为12%(n = 5)。有趣的是,皮瓣失败率与手术时机之间存在关联。五例皮瓣失败中有四例发生在创伤后5至21天内,所有五例皮瓣失败均发生在五天至六周之间。二期重建期间未出现皮瓣失败。
我们的数据表明,烧伤和高压电损伤是不同的情况,每种情况都需要为肢体挽救量身定制重建方案。即使我们所有的皮瓣失败都发生在前六周内,但不应忘记,在某些选择性病例中,这种覆盖方式是截肢的唯一替代方法。