Dworkin Ian
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada.
Evolution. 2005 Jul;59(7):1500-9.
Among the explanations for minimizing the effects of extraneous variation has been canalization and developmental stability. However, there is little agreement as to whether these two processes reflect a common set of mechanisms. This confusion is inflated due to the lack of consensus as to a precise definition of canalization. In this study, canalization in the sternopleural bristle system is used to investigate the relationships between measures of canalization and developmental stability by comparing how a panel of naturally derived lines responds to both genetic and environmental perturbations. No evidence for a common mechanism between the different measures of canalization was observed. Furthermore, a hypothesis regarding a common mechanism for environmental and genetic canalization was tested, and no evidence was found to support it. However, there is evidence for a relationship between at least one form of canalization and developmental stability.
对将外部变异的影响降至最低的解释包括发育稳态和发育稳定性。然而,对于这两个过程是否反映了一组共同的机制,人们几乎没有达成共识。由于对发育稳态的确切定义缺乏共识,这种混淆更加严重。在本研究中,通过比较一组自然衍生品系对遗传和环境扰动的反应方式,利用胸侧板刚毛系统中的发育稳态来研究发育稳态测量与发育稳定性之间的关系。未观察到不同发育稳态测量之间存在共同机制的证据。此外,还对一个关于环境和遗传发育稳态共同机制的假设进行了检验,未发现支持该假设的证据。然而,有证据表明至少一种形式的发育稳态与发育稳定性之间存在关联。