Wang Yi-Chih, Lin Lung-Chun, Lin Mao-Shin, Lai Ling-Ping, Hwang Juey-Jen, Tseng Yung-Zu, Tseng Chuen-Den, Lin Jiunn-Lee
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan, ROC.
Cardiology. 2005;104(4):202-9. doi: 10.1159/000088174. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
Identification of good responders to rhythm control in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is worthwhile in terms of increasing hemodynamic benefit and decreasing the likelihood of unstable anticoagulation even after the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management.
We tested the hypothesis that atrial substrate determines the risk of recurrence on rhythm control both in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and in those with persistent or sustained AF (> or =1 week, SAF). There were 90 consecutive patients (mean age 63 +/- 12 years, 67 males and 23 females) with previous PAF (n = 66) or SAF (n = 24). They were maintained in sinus rhythm successfully for at least 1 month after conversion and then studied by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. All of the patients were followed regularly by determination of symptoms, 12-lead ECG and intermittent Holter recording to determine recurrence of AF after echocardiographic study.
After 9.1 +/- 3.8 (range 3-12) months of follow-up, 23 of the 90 (26%) patients had documented recurrence of AF (67 without recurrence). Univariate analysis of demographic characteristics, medications, ECG and echocardiographic parameters revealed that, compared with the group of patients without recurrent AF, the group of those with it included more members of the SAF group (11/27 vs. 13/67, p = 0.039), included more male subjects (22/23 vs. 45/67, p = 0.045), had a larger left atrial volume index (LAVI; 27 +/- 9 vs. 22 +/- 9 ml/m2, p = 0.024) and had lower LA appendage peak emptying velocity (LAAPEV; 42 +/- 15 vs. 55 +/- 22 cm/s, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and AF group revealed that patients with LAVI <30 ml/m2 and LAAPEV >46 cm/s had the least recurrence of AF (relative risk 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.55, vs. with LAVI >30 ml/m2 or LAAPEV <46 cm/s, p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier probability of freedom from AF recurrence was significantly better when LAVI <30 ml/m2 (log-rank p = 0.02), LAAPEV > 46 cm/s (p = 0.013) or both (p = 0.004). The superiority to predict the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance was the same in the PAF and SAF groups.
Good responders to rhythm control in the PAF and SAF groups share the characteristics of smaller LA volume and better LAA contractile function, emphasizing the critical role of atrial substrate remodeling in recurrence of AF.
在心房颤动(AF)管理中,识别节律控制的良好反应者对于增加血流动力学益处以及降低即使在房颤节律管理随访研究后不稳定抗凝的可能性而言是值得的。
我们检验了这样一个假设,即心房基质决定阵发性房颤(PAF)患者以及持续性或永久性房颤(≥1周,SAF)患者节律控制后复发的风险。连续纳入90例既往有PAF(n = 66)或SAF(n = 24)的患者(平均年龄63±12岁,男性67例,女性23例)。转复后他们成功维持窦性心律至少1个月,然后接受经胸和经食管超声心动图检查。通过确定症状、12导联心电图和间歇性动态心电图记录对所有患者进行定期随访,以确定超声心动图检查后房颤的复发情况。
经过9.1±3.8(范围3 - 12)个月的随访,90例患者中有23例(26%)记录到房颤复发(67例未复发)。对人口统计学特征、用药情况、心电图和超声心动图参数进行单因素分析显示,与无房颤复发的患者组相比,有复发的患者组中SAF组的成员更多(11/27对13/67,p = 0.039),男性受试者更多(22/23对45/67,p = 0.045),左房容积指数(LAVI)更大(27±9对22±9 ml/m²,p = 0.024),左心耳峰值排空速度(LAAPEV)更低(42±15对55±22 cm/s,p = 0.01)。对年龄、性别和房颤组进行校正的多因素Cox比例风险回归分析显示,LAVI<30 ml/m²且LAAPEV>46 cm/s的患者房颤复发最少(相对风险0.18,95%置信区间0.06 - 0.55,与LAVI>30 ml/m²或LAAPEV<46 cm/s相比,p = 0.002)。当LAVI<30 ml/m²(对数秩p = 0.02)、LAAPEV>46 cm/s(p = 0.013)或两者兼具(p = 0.004)时,Kaplan - Meier无房颤复发概率显著更好。在PAF组和SAF组中预测窦性心律维持率的优越性相同。
PAF组和SAF组节律控制的良好反应者具有左房容积较小和左心耳收缩功能较好的特征,强调了心房基质重塑在房颤复发中的关键作用。