Mayoral F, Torres F
Sección de Psiquiatría, Hospital Carlos Haya, Avda. Gálvez Ginachero s/n, 29007 Málaga, Spain.
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2005 Sep-Oct;33(5):331-8.
The use of coercive measures in the treatment of medical patients dates back to the origins of psychiatry. The difficult balance between patient protection and safety, patient rights and freedom to choose treatment has provoked strong discussion in the psychiatric practice since the age of Pinel and "moral treatment". Their short and long-term effectiveness and their influence on treatment adherence as well as the subjective perception of patients submitted to coercive measures and their relationship with the awareness of illness are only some of the questions for which we still have few answers.
This article reviews and updates the topic on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric treatment. It forms a part of the EUNOMIA project, a European study evaluating the use of coercive measures in the treatment of psychiatric patients in twelve countries.
(a) The use of coercive measures (seclusion, physical and chemical restraint) in the treatment of psychiatric patients is very common in psychiatric hospitalization; (b) there is a remarkable lack of experimental studies concerning the use of these measures, and (c) from the legal viewpoint, ambiguity still exists in the regulation of the application of these measures.
在医疗患者的治疗中使用强制措施可追溯到精神病学的起源。自皮内尔时代和“道德治疗”以来,在患者保护与安全、患者权利与选择治疗的自由之间艰难的平衡在精神病学实践中引发了激烈的讨论。它们的短期和长期有效性、对治疗依从性的影响,以及接受强制措施的患者的主观感受及其与疾病认知的关系,只是我们仍知之甚少的部分问题。
本文回顾并更新了精神病治疗中使用强制措施这一主题。它是EUNOMIA项目的一部分,该项目是一项欧洲研究,评估了十二个国家在精神病患者治疗中使用强制措施的情况。
(a)在精神病住院治疗中,使用强制措施(隔离、身体和化学约束)治疗精神病患者的情况非常普遍;(b)关于这些措施的使用,明显缺乏实验研究;(c)从法律角度来看,这些措施应用的监管仍存在模糊之处。