Roldán Nofuentes J A, Luna del Castillo J D
Bioestadística, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Spain.
Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):442-57. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410134.
The comparison of the efficiency of two binary diagnostic tests requires one to know the disease status for all patients in the sample, by applying a gold standard. In two-phase studies the gold standard is not applied to all patients in a sample, and the problem of partial verification of the disease arises. At present, one of the approaches most used for comparing two binary diagnostic tests are the likelihood ratios. In this study, the maximum likelihood estimators of likelihood ratios are obtained. The tests of hypothesis to compare the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests when both are applied to the same random sample in the presence of verification bias are deduced, and simulation experiments are performed in order to investigate the asymptotic behaviour of the tests of hypothesis. The results obtained have been applied to the study of Alzheimer's disease.
比较两种二元诊断测试的效率需要通过应用金标准来了解样本中所有患者的疾病状态。在两阶段研究中,金标准并非应用于样本中的所有患者,从而出现了疾病部分验证的问题。目前,比较两种二元诊断测试最常用的方法之一是似然比。在本研究中,获得了似然比的最大似然估计值。推导了在存在验证偏倚的情况下,当两种二元诊断测试应用于相同随机样本时比较它们似然比的假设检验,并进行了模拟实验以研究假设检验的渐近行为。所获得的结果已应用于阿尔茨海默病的研究。