Jones Julie L, Zabicki Katherina, Christian Roger L, Gadd Michele A, Hughes Kevin S, Lesnikoski Beth A, Rhei Esther, Specht Michelle C, Dominguez Francisco J, Smith Barbara L
Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey Building, 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Am J Surg. 2005 Oct;190(4):517-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.004.
Because neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being used more frequently, the optimal timing of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) remains controversial. We previously evaluated the predictive value of SNB before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Our identification rate of the sentinel node among 52 patients before chemotherapy with a mean tumor size of 4 cm was 100%. In this study, we compared the identification rates of SNB before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluated the false-negative rate of SNB after chemotherapy.
A retrospective institutional database review identified 36 women who underwent SNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer from 1999 to 2004. The initial clinical tumor size and lymph node status, SNB pathology, axillary lymph node dissection pathology, and residual pathologic tumor size were reviewed.
Sixteen of 36 patients had a clinically negative axilla before neoadjuvant therapy. SNB after neoadjuvant therapy was successful in 29 patients (80.6%), although 7 patients did not map (19.4%). Six of the 7 patients who failed to map had a clinically positive axilla initially. Axillary disease was found in 6 of 7 of these patients at dissection (85.7%). Of the 29 patients who mapped successfully, 13 (45%) were SNB negative, and 16 (55%) were SNB positive. Of the 13 SNB-negative patients, 2 had a positive axillary lymph node dissection, yielding a false-negative rate of 11%. Thirteen patients who mapped had a clinically positive axilla before therapy (45%). Of the 11 patients with true-negative SNBs, 7 (64%) were clinically node negative at presentation. The initial tumor sizes on examination ranged from 2 to 9 cm (mean, 5.0 cm), and residual pathologic tumor sizes ranged from 0 to 6 cm (mean, 1.8 cm). Failure to map correlated with a clinically positive axilla at presentation (100% vs 45%) but did not correlate with initial tumor size.
Sentinel node identification rates are significantly better when mapping is performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (100% vs 80.6%), with failure to map correlated with clinically positive nodal disease at presentation and residual disease at axillary lymph node dissection. Among patients who map successfully after chemotherapy, the false-negative rate is high (11%). Given these findings, we currently recommend SNB before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinically node-negative patients, and raise concerns about the use of SNB after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with an initially clinically positive axilla.
由于新辅助化疗的使用越来越频繁,前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)的最佳时机仍存在争议。我们之前评估了新辅助化疗前SNB在临床腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中的预测价值。我们在平均肿瘤大小为4 cm的52例患者化疗前对前哨淋巴结的识别率为100%。在本研究中,我们比较了新辅助化疗前后SNB的识别率,并评估了化疗后SNB的假阴性率。
一项回顾性机构数据库研究确定了1999年至2004年期间36例在新辅助化疗后接受乳腺癌SNB的女性。回顾了初始临床肿瘤大小和淋巴结状态、SNB病理、腋窝淋巴结清扫病理以及残余病理肿瘤大小。
36例患者中有16例在新辅助治疗前临床腋窝淋巴结阴性。新辅助治疗后SNB在29例患者中成功(80.6%),尽管7例未找到前哨淋巴结(19.4%)。7例未找到前哨淋巴结的患者中有6例最初临床腋窝淋巴结阳性。在这些患者中,7例中有6例在清扫时发现腋窝有病变(85.7%)。在29例成功找到前哨淋巴结的患者中,13例(45%)SNB阴性,16例(55%)SNB阳性。在13例SNB阴性患者中,2例腋窝淋巴结清扫阳性,假阴性率为11%。13例找到前哨淋巴结的患者在治疗前临床腋窝淋巴结阳性(45%)。在11例SNB真阴性患者中,7例(64%)就诊时临床腋窝淋巴结阴性。检查时初始肿瘤大小为2至9 cm(平均5.0 cm),残余病理肿瘤大小为零至6 cm(平均1.8 cm)。未找到前哨淋巴结与就诊时临床腋窝淋巴结阳性相关(100%对45%),但与初始肿瘤大小无关。
新辅助化疗前进行前哨淋巴结定位时,前哨淋巴结识别率明显更高(100%对80.6%),未找到前哨淋巴结与就诊时临床淋巴结阳性疾病以及腋窝淋巴结清扫时的残余疾病相关。在化疗后成功找到前哨淋巴结的患者中,假阴性率较高(11%)。基于这些发现,我们目前建议临床腋窝淋巴结阴性患者在新辅助化疗前进行SNB,并对初始临床腋窝淋巴结阳性患者在新辅助治疗后使用SNB表示担忧。