Boxer G M, Begent R H, Kelly A M, Southall P J, Blair S B, Theodorou N A, Dawson P M, Ledermann J A
University Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1992 Jun;65(6):825-31. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.176.
Tumour localisation of anti-tumour antibodies varies greatly between patients. Factors which may be responsible for this have been investigated in 56 patients with colorectal carcinoma with a view to improving radioimmunotherapy. Thirty-seven to seventy-four MBq of 125-I labelled mouse monoclonal antibody to CEA, was given intravenously and tumour resected 70-480 h later. Percentage injected activity kg-1 (% inj.act kg-1) in tumour, was inversely correlated with the time interval between injection and operation (P = 0.004). To assess the influence of other parameters on localisation, patients were divided into two time groups according to time interval between injection and operation, 70-120 h (n = 33) and 144-480 h (n = 23). In neither group was there a significant correlation of % inj.act kg-1 with time. The % inj.act kg-1 in tumour showed a significant correlation with that in the blood for both groups (P = 0.005 and P = 0.01). There was no significant correlation for either time group between % inj.act kg-1 in tumour and serum CEA values, the per cent of tumour cells positive for CEA and vascularity. Tumour to blood ratios varied considerably (range 0.3-28.5:1) suggesting that factors other than time and persistence of activity in the blood contribute to efficient targeting. Tumour to blood ratios were inversely correlated with % inj.act kg-1 in blood for the 70-120 h group (P = 0.007), and were positively correlated with % inj.act kg-1 in tumour (P = 0.012). Autoradiography showed that antibody localised predominantly on tumour cells but was distributed heterogeneously, was not solely related to the expression of antigen and in some cases accumulated in necrotic more than viable areas of tumour. Penetration of antibody into malignant acinar structures was poor and CEA-positive cells closer to the blood supply were targeted to a greater extent than distant cells. Preoperative administration of radiolabelled antibody to CEA may be helpful in selecting patients with favourable localisation for radioimmunotherapy.
抗肿瘤抗体在患者之间的肿瘤定位差异很大。为了改进放射免疫疗法,对56例结直肠癌患者中可能导致这种情况的因素进行了研究。静脉注射37至74MBq的125-I标记的抗癌胚抗原(CEA)小鼠单克隆抗体,70至480小时后切除肿瘤。肿瘤中每千克注射活性百分比(%inj.act kg-1)与注射和手术之间的时间间隔呈负相关(P = 0.004)。为了评估其他参数对定位的影响,根据注射和手术之间的时间间隔将患者分为两个时间组,70至120小时(n = 33)和144至480小时(n = 23)。在这两个组中,%inj.act kg-1与时间均无显著相关性。肿瘤中的%inj.act kg-1与血液中的%inj.act kg-1在两组中均显示出显著相关性(P = 0.005和P = 0.01)。在两个时间组中,肿瘤中的%inj.act kg-1与血清CEA值、CEA阳性肿瘤细胞百分比和血管密度均无显著相关性。肿瘤与血液的比率差异很大(范围为0.3至28.5:1),这表明除了时间和血液中活性的持续存在外,其他因素也有助于有效靶向。在70至120小时组中,肿瘤与血液的比率与血液中的%inj.act kg-1呈负相关(P = 0.007),与肿瘤中的%inj.act kg-1呈正相关(P = 0.012)。放射自显影显示抗体主要定位于肿瘤细胞,但分布不均匀,不仅与抗原表达有关,在某些情况下,在肿瘤坏死区域的积累多于存活区域。抗体进入恶性腺泡结构的穿透性较差,靠近血液供应的CEA阳性细胞比远处细胞的靶向程度更高。术前给予放射性标记的抗CEA抗体可能有助于选择放射免疫疗法定位良好的患者。