Khurana Rohit, Simons Michael, Martin John F, Zachary Ian C
Department of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6JJ, UK.
Circulation. 2005 Sep 20;112(12):1813-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.535294.
The role of angiogenesis in atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases has emerged as a major unresolved issue. Angiogenesis has attracted interest from opposite perspectives. Angiogenic cytokine therapy has been widely regarded as an attractive approach both for treating ischemic heart disease and for enhancing arterioprotective functions of the endothelium; conversely, a variety of studies suggest that neovascularization contributes to the growth of atherosclerotic lesions and is a key factor in plaque destabilization leading to rupture. Here, we critically review the evidence supporting a role for angiogenesis and angiogenic factors in atherosclerosis and neointima formation, emphasizing the problems raised by some of the landmark studies and the suitability of animal models of atherosclerosis and neointimal thickening for investigating the role of angiogenesis. Because many of the relevant studies have focused on the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), we consider this work in the wider context of VEGF biology and in light of recent experience from clinical trials of VEGF and other angiogenic cytokines for ischemic heart disease. Also discussed are recent findings suggesting that, although angiogenesis may contribute to neointimal growth, it is not required for the initiation of intimal thickening. Our assessment of the evidence leads us to conclude that, although microvessels are a feature of advanced human atherosclerotic plaques, it remains unclear whether angiogenesis either plays a central role in the development of atherosclerosis or is responsible for plaque instability. Furthermore, current evidence from clinical trials of both proangiogenic and antiangiogenic therapies does not suggest that inhibition of angiogenesis is likely to be a viable therapeutic strategy for cardiovascular disease.
血管生成在动脉粥样硬化及其他心血管疾病中的作用已成为一个主要的未解决问题。血管生成从相反的角度引发了人们的兴趣。血管生成细胞因子疗法被广泛认为是治疗缺血性心脏病以及增强内皮细胞动脉保护功能的一种有吸引力的方法;相反,各种研究表明新生血管形成有助于动脉粥样硬化病变的发展,并且是导致斑块破裂的斑块不稳定的关键因素。在此,我们批判性地回顾支持血管生成和血管生成因子在动脉粥样硬化和新生内膜形成中作用的证据,强调一些具有里程碑意义的研究所提出的问题,以及动脉粥样硬化和新生内膜增厚动物模型在研究血管生成作用方面的适用性。由于许多相关研究都集中在血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的作用上,我们在VEGF生物学的更广泛背景下,并根据VEGF和其他血管生成细胞因子用于缺血性心脏病的临床试验的最新经验来考虑这项工作。还讨论了最近的研究结果,这些结果表明,尽管血管生成可能有助于新生内膜生长,但内膜增厚的起始并不需要血管生成。我们对证据的评估使我们得出结论,尽管微血管是晚期人类动脉粥样硬化斑块的一个特征,但血管生成是否在动脉粥样硬化的发展中起核心作用或是否导致斑块不稳定仍不清楚。此外,目前促血管生成和抗血管生成疗法的临床试验证据并不表明抑制血管生成可能是心血管疾病的一种可行治疗策略。