Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后交感神经皮肤反应的床边评估:一项比较吸气喘息和视觉刺激的简要报告。

Bedside assessment of sympathetic skin response after spinal cord injury: a brief report comparing inspiratory gasp and visual stimulus.

作者信息

Nagarajarao H S, Kumar B N, Watt J W H, Wiredu E, Bhamidimarri K

机构信息

Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport Hospital, Southport, UK.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2006 Apr;44(4):217-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101821.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A case control study in five controls, and 20 tetraplegic and paraplegic patients, complete and incomplete.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the feasibility of a simple test for sympathetic system preservation after spinal cord damage in a pain-free manner and which could be undertaken worldwide without specialist equipment or manpower.

SETTINGS

Patients were attending the Southport Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, England, either as outpatients or as in-patients during rehabilitation.

METHODS

The sympathetic skin response (SSR) was recorded on a single-channel ECG recorder from the right hand and right foot in turn after inspiratory gasp (IG) or visual stimulation.

RESULTS

Unlike the visually evoked SSR, the gasp-evoked SSR was reliable, albeit of variable amplitude, and there was little difference between the hand and foot. Paraplegics had similar SSRs in the hands as the controls. There was minor insignificant habituation of response for the gasp reflex. There was occasional unexpected SSR distally in patients with complete lesions, and in patients with incomplete lesions the responses could not have been predicted from the sensory motor pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Trained IG induces an SSR which is sufficient to elucidate sympathetic loss following spinal cord injury. It is superior to visual stimulation in this respect. Habituation is not a problem with at least 1 min between tests, and high doses of anticholinergics agents may impair the response.

摘要

研究设计

一项病例对照研究,纳入5名对照者以及20名四肢瘫和截瘫患者,包括完全性和不完全性损伤患者。

目的

旨在评估一种简单测试的可行性,该测试可在无痛状态下检测脊髓损伤后交感神经系统的保留情况,且无需专业设备或人力即可在全球范围内开展。

研究地点

患者在英格兰南港地区脊髓损伤中心接受门诊或康复住院治疗。

方法

在吸气屏气(IG)或视觉刺激后,依次使用单通道心电图记录仪记录右手和右脚的交感皮肤反应(SSR)。

结果

与视觉诱发的SSR不同,屏气诱发的SSR可靠,尽管幅度有所变化,且手部和足部之间差异不大。截瘫患者手部的SSR与对照者相似。屏气反射的反应存在轻微的不显著的习惯化现象。完全性损伤患者偶尔会在远端出现意外的SSR,而不完全性损伤患者的反应无法根据感觉运动模式预测。

结论

经过训练的吸气屏气可诱发足以阐明脊髓损伤后交感神经损伤情况的SSR。在这方面,它优于视觉刺激。测试间隔至少1分钟时,习惯化不是问题,高剂量抗胆碱能药物可能会削弱反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验