Suppr超能文献

从反复检查探索记忆不信任的边界:提高外部效度并检验阈值。

Exploring the boundaries of memory distrust from repeated checking: increasing external validity and examining thresholds.

作者信息

Coles Meredith E, Radomsky Adam S, Horng Betty

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, SUNY, NY 13902-6000, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jul;44(7):995-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 19.

Abstract

Checking behavior is among the most common forms of compulsions in OCD. Recent research suggests that repeated checking decreases memory confidence, and supports theoretical models of how repeated checking is maintained. The current paper presents findings from two studies exploring the boundaries of memory distrust from repeated checking. Results of study 1 show that repeated checking of a real stove decreases memory confidence, vividness, and detail (i.e., metamemory), and leads to a greater reliance on knowing as a source of memory, without meaningfully altering memory accuracy. Results of study 2 suggest that these changes in metamemory are observed after performing a relatively low number of checks on one occasion. The findings are considered within the context of theoretical models of checking and future directions are delineated.

摘要

检查行为是强迫症中最常见的强迫形式之一。最近的研究表明,反复检查会降低记忆信心,并支持关于反复检查如何持续存在的理论模型。本文呈现了两项研究的结果,这些研究探索了反复检查导致记忆不信任的边界。研究1的结果表明,对真实炉灶的反复检查会降低记忆信心、生动性和细节(即元记忆),并导致更依赖“知道”作为记忆来源,而不会显著改变记忆准确性。研究2的结果表明,在一次进行相对较少次数的检查后,就会观察到元记忆的这些变化。这些发现将在检查的理论模型背景下进行考量,并勾勒出未来的研究方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验