Mosteller Timothy
Department of Philosophy, Biola University, 13800 Biola Ave., La Mirada, CA 90639, USA.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26(4):339-50. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-4888-5.
Cloned organisms can be genetically altered so that they do not exhibit higher brain functioning. This form of therapeutic cloning allows for genetically identical organs and tissues to be harvested from the clone for the use of the organism that is cloned. "Spare parts" cloning promises many opportunities for future medical advances. What is the ontological and ethical status of spare parts, headless clones? This paper attempts to answer this question from the perspective of Aristotle's view of the soul. Aristotle's metaphysics as applied to his view of biological essences generates an ethic that can contribute to moral reasoning regarding the use of headless spare parts clones. The task of this paper is to show the implications that Aristotle's view of the soul, if it is true, would have on the ethics of headless, spare parts cloning.
克隆生物可以在基因上进行改造,使其不具备高级大脑功能。这种治疗性克隆形式使得可以从克隆体上获取基因完全相同的器官和组织,以供被克隆的生物体使用。“备用器官”克隆为未来医学进步带来了诸多机遇。那么,无头克隆备用器官的本体论和伦理地位是什么呢?本文试图从亚里士多德的灵魂观角度来回答这个问题。亚里士多德的形而上学应用于他对生物本质的看法时,产生了一种伦理观念,这有助于对使用无头备用器官克隆体进行道德推理。本文的任务是表明,如果亚里士多德的灵魂观是正确的,那么它对无头备用器官克隆伦理会产生哪些影响。