Estrera Anthony L, Miller Charles C, Chen Edward P, Meada Riad, Torres Ricardo H, Porat Eyal E, Huynh Tam T, Azizzadeh Ali, Safi Hazim J
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Houston Medical School, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Oct;80(4):1290-6; discussion 1296. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.021.
The benefit of distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage over the "clamp and sew" technique during repairs of the descending thoracic aorta is still being debated. The purpose of this report is to analyze our experience with regard to neurologic deficit (paraplegia and paraparesis) and mortality using the adjuncts of distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage.
Between February 1991 and September 2004, we repaired 355 descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Excluded from analysis were 29 patients who required profound hypothermic circulatory arrest as a result of transverse arch involvement and 26 patients with aortic rupture, leaving a group of 300 patients for which outcomes were analyzed. Mean patient age was 67 years, and 102 (34%) of the patients were women. The adjunct group of distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage used in 238 (79.3%) patients was compared with a group of 62 patients who underwent simple cross-clamp with or without the addition of a single adjunct. Multivariable data were analyzed by Cox regression.
The incidence of neurologic deficit after all repairs was 2.3% (7 of 300 patients). The incidence of neurologic deficit (immediate and delayed) in the adjunct group was 1.3% (3 of 238 patients), and in the nonadjunct group was 6.5% (4 of 62 patients; p < 0.02). One case of delayed paraplegia occurred in each group. All neurologic deficits occurred in patients with aneurysmal involvement of the entire descending thoracic aorta (extent C; p < 0.02). Statistically significant predictors for neurologic deficit were the use of the adjunct (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; p = 0.02), previous repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR, 7.0; p = 0.005), type C aneurysm (OR, 13.73; p = 0.02), and cerebrovascular disease history (OR, 4.7; p < 0.03). Thirty-day mortality was 8% (24 of 300 patients). Significant multivariate predictors of 30-day mortality were preoperative renal dysfunction (OR, 4.6; p < 0.01) and female sex (OR, 2.9; p < 0.03).
Repairs of the descending thoracic aorta using the adjunct of distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage can be performed with a low incidence of neurologic deficit and an acceptable mortality. The use of the adjuncts should be considered during elective repairs of the descending thoracic aorta.
在降主动脉修复术中,与“钳夹缝合”技术相比,远端主动脉灌注和脑脊液引流的益处仍存在争议。本报告的目的是分析我们使用远端主动脉灌注和脑脊液引流辅助手段在神经功能缺损(截瘫和轻截瘫)及死亡率方面的经验。
1991年2月至2004年9月期间,我们修复了355例降主动脉瘤。因累及横弓而需要深度低温循环骤停的29例患者以及26例主动脉破裂患者被排除在分析之外,剩余300例患者的治疗结果被分析。患者平均年龄为67岁,其中102例(34%)为女性。将238例(79.3%)使用远端主动脉灌注和脑脊液引流辅助手段的患者组与62例接受单纯交叉钳夹(无论是否添加单一辅助手段)的患者组进行比较。多变量数据通过Cox回归分析。
所有修复术后神经功能缺损的发生率为2.3%(300例患者中的7例)。辅助手段组中神经功能缺损(即时和延迟)的发生率为1.3%(238例患者中的3例),非辅助手段组为6.5%(62例患者中的4例;p<0.02)。每组各发生1例延迟性截瘫。所有神经功能缺损均发生在降主动脉全程动脉瘤累及的患者中(C型;p<0.02)。神经功能缺损的统计学显著预测因素为辅助手段的使用(比值比[OR],0.19;p = 0.02)、既往腹主动脉瘤修复史(OR,7.0;p = 0.005)、C型动脉瘤(OR,13.73;p = 0.02)以及脑血管疾病史(OR,4.7;p<0.03)。30天死亡率为8%(300例患者中的24例)。30天死亡率的显著多变量预测因素为术前肾功能不全(OR,4.6;p<0.01)和女性(OR,2.9;p<0.03)。
使用远端主动脉灌注和脑脊液引流辅助手段进行降主动脉修复术时,神经功能缺损发生率低,死亡率可接受。在降主动脉择期修复术中应考虑使用辅助手段。