Smith Matthew J, Tong Henry C
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1741-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.044.
To evaluate the analgesic effect of acupuncture for needle electromyography and to validate a sham acupuncture needle.
Randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.
University-based electrodiagnostics laboratory.
Fifty-one subjects referred for electrodiagnostic evaluation.
Before the electromyography examination, either real acupuncture needles or telescopic sham needles were applied.
Visual analog scale of pain and unpleasantness after 3 muscles were examined with electromyography. Pretest pain was subtracted to give a measurement of pain attributable to the electromyography. Subjects were asked which needle they thought they had received.
Twenty-six subjects were randomized to the treatment group and 25 to the sham group. Pain in the treatment group (-.96) was less than in the control group (9.68), but it was not statistically significant (P=.13). Post hoc analysis, excluding 5 subjects known to have been treated by the novice acupuncturist, showed a significant difference of 14.4mm (P=.02). The proportion of subjects who thought they received real needles in the acupuncture group (69%) did not differ from the proportion in the control group (48%) (P=.13).
Acupuncture may represent an effective form of analgesia for electromyography. This is the first study to suggest independently the telescopic sham acupuncture needle as an effective control.
评估针刺对针电极肌电图检查的镇痛效果,并验证一种假针刺针。
随机、双盲、对照研究。
大学电诊断实验室。
51名接受电诊断评估的受试者。
在肌电图检查前,使用真针灸针或伸缩式假针。
对3块肌肉进行肌电图检查后,采用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛和不适感。减去预测试时的疼痛,得出肌电图检查所致疼痛的测量值。询问受试者他们认为自己接受的是哪种针。
26名受试者被随机分配到治疗组,25名被分配到假治疗组。治疗组的疼痛程度(-0.96)低于对照组(9.68),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.13)。事后分析排除了5名已知由新手针灸师治疗的受试者,结果显示差异有统计学意义,相差14.4mm(P = 0.02)。针灸组中认为自己接受了真针的受试者比例(69%)与对照组(48%)相比无差异(P = 0.13)。
针刺可能是肌电图检查一种有效的镇痛方式。这是第一项独立提出伸缩式假针灸针作为有效对照的研究。