Strojnik Tadej, Kavalar Rajko, Trinkaus Miha, Lah Tamara T
Department of Neurosurgery, Maribor General Hospital, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29(5):448-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
Lysosomal cysteine cathepsins have been implicated in tumor progression. This study is aimed to reveal differential expression and compare the prognostic significance of cathepsins B and L in glioma patients.
The histological slides of 82 patients with primary astrocytic tumors were reviewed. We evaluated the immunostaining of the cathepsins in tumor and endothelial cells.
Cathepsins B and L stained positive in 98 and 88% of cases, respectively. The total score was significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumors, both for cathepsin B (p<0.001) and for cathepsin L (p<0.01). The IHC score in endothelial cells in the malignant group was significantly higher only for cathepsin B (p<0.0001). Survival analysis indicated that in contrast to the prognostic significance of total cathepsin B and endothelial cells associated cathepsin B for shorter patients' survival, the prognostic role of cathepsin L was not confirmed.
Cathepsin L is preferentially expressed in tumor cells, increasing with glioma progression, but is not significantly associated with new vasculature of glioblastoma. In contrast to cathepsin B, cathepsin L has no prognostic impact, suggesting different roles of the two cathepsins in glioma progression.