Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤后连线测验的解读:传统时间分数与衍生指标的比较

Interpreting the trail making test following traumatic brain injury: comparison of traditional time scores and derived indices.

作者信息

Lange Rael T, Iverson Grant L, Zakrzewski Martin J, Ethel-King Patrick E, Franzen Michael D

机构信息

Riverview Hospital, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Oct;27(7):897-906. doi: 10.1080/1380339049091290.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical application of traditional time scores and various derived indices from the Trail Making Test (TMT) in a sample of 571 patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants were classified into four injury severity groups. A clear linear relation between injury severity and TMT performance was demonstrated, with the more severely brain injured patients performing more poorly on most measures. Hierarchical logistic regression analysis of TMT time scores across binary extreme groups based on injury severity resulted in high classification rates for patients with very mild TBI (93.0% correctly classified) and low classification rates for patients with moderate to severe TBI (50.0% correctly classified). However, TMT derived indices did not provide a unique contribution to test interpretation beyond what is already available from Part A and B separately.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨传统时间分数以及从连线测验(TMT)得出的各种衍生指标在571例急性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者样本中的临床应用。参与者被分为四个损伤严重程度组。结果表明损伤严重程度与TMT表现之间存在明显的线性关系,脑损伤越严重的患者在大多数指标上表现越差。基于损伤严重程度对二元极端组的TMT时间分数进行分层逻辑回归分析,结果显示非常轻度TBI患者的分类率较高(正确分类率为93.0%),而中度至重度TBI患者的分类率较低(正确分类率为50.0%)。然而,TMT衍生指标除了分别从A部分和B部分已有的信息外,并未为测试解释提供独特的贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验