von Euler Mia, Eliasson Erik, Ohlén Gunnar, Bergman Ulf
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Mar;15(3):179-84. doi: 10.1002/pds.1154.
To use computerized medical records to study the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADR) as a cause for acute admission to a university hospital.
Computerized medical records in 168 consecutively acutely admitted cases to a short-term internal medicine ward at a university hospital were retrospectively evaluated to see if an ADR could have caused the admission.
In 18 cases (11%), an ADR was judged to be the reason for acute admission to the hospital. Augmented pharmacological effects (type A reactions) accounted for 89% of the cases. An additional eight cases (5%) were intentional intoxications with prescription drugs. ADR-associated hospital admissions were age-related (average age 72 compared to 65 in patients admitted for other reasons) and also associated with poly-pharmacy (8.3 drugs compared to 5.2). The ADR was considered to arise from a drug-drug interaction in four cases (22%). Although all ADRs fulfilled the criteria for mandatory reporting, none of them were reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (SADRAC).
The observed frequency of ADR-related acute hospital admissions in this pilot study is similar to earlier reported data from Sweden and abroad. Almost all of these reactions were known pharmacological (type A) reactions and many therefore theoretically preventable. In contrast to many prospective and costly studies, this retrospective analysis of computerized medical records offered a simple method that can be used in routine health care and also serve as an indicator of the quality of drug use.
利用计算机化病历研究药物不良反应(ADR)作为大学医院急性入院原因的发生频率。
对一所大学医院短期内科病房连续收治的168例急性病例的计算机化病历进行回顾性评估,以确定ADR是否可能是入院原因。
18例(11%)被判定ADR是急性入院的原因。增强药理作用(A型反应)占病例的89%。另外8例(5%)为处方药故意中毒。与ADR相关的住院与年龄有关(平均年龄72岁,而因其他原因入院的患者为65岁),也与多药联用有关(8.3种药物,而其他患者为5.2种)。4例(22%)的ADR被认为是由药物相互作用引起的。尽管所有ADR均符合强制报告标准,但均未向瑞典药物不良反应咨询委员会(SADRAC)报告。
在这项初步研究中观察到的与ADR相关的急性住院频率与瑞典和国外早期报告的数据相似。几乎所有这些反应都是已知的药理(A型)反应,因此从理论上讲许多是可以预防的。与许多前瞻性且成本高昂的研究不同,这种对计算机化病历的回顾性分析提供了一种可用于常规医疗保健的简单方法,也可作为药物使用质量的指标。