Suppr超能文献

在接受经典环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶治疗的绝经前淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中,肿瘤包膜外扩散对局部区域控制的预后价值:国际乳腺癌研究组试验VI的长期观察结果

Prognostic value of extracapsular tumor spread for locoregional control in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: long-term observations from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VI.

作者信息

Gruber Günther, Bonetti Marco, Nasi M Laura, Price Karen N, Castiglione-Gertsch Monica, Rudenstam Carl-Magnus, Holmberg Stig B, Lindtner Jurij, Golouh Rastko, Collins John, Crivellari Diana, Carbone Antonino, Thürlimann Beat, Simoncini Edda, Fey Martin F, Gelber Richard D, Coates Alan S, Goldhirsch Aron

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, and the Institute of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7089-97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.123.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to determine retrospectively whether extracapsular spread (ECS) might identify a subgroup that could benefit from radiotherapy after mastectomy, especially patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes (LN1-3+).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomized 1,475 premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to three, six, or nine courses of "classical" CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil). After a review of all pathology forms, 933 patients (63%) had information on the presence or absence of ECS. ECS was present in 49.5%. The median follow-up was 10 years.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, ECS was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In multivariate analyses adjusting for tumor size, vessel invasion, surgery type, and age group, ECS remained significant (DFS: hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.93; P < .0001; OS: 1.67; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.08; P < .0001). However, ECS was not significant when the number of positive nodes was added. The locoregional failure rate +/- distant failure (LRF +/- distant failure) within 10 years was estimated at 19% (+/- 2%) without ECS, versus 27% (+/- 2%) with ECS. The difference was statistically significant in univariate analyses, but not after adjusting for the number of positive nodes. No independent effect of ECS on DFS, OS, or LRF could be confirmed within the subgroup of 382 patients with LN1-3+ treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not support an independent prognostic value of ECS, nor its use as an indication for irradiation in premenopausal patients with LN1-3+ treated with classical CMF. However, we could not examine whether extensive ECS is of prognostic importance.

摘要

目的

我们旨在进行回顾性研究,以确定乳腺切除术后的包膜外扩散(ECS)是否可识别出能从放疗中获益的亚组患者,尤其是有1至3枚阳性淋巴结(LN1 - 3 +)的患者。

患者与方法

我们将1475例绝经前淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性患者随机分为接受三个、六个或九个疗程的“经典”CMF(环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶)治疗组。在审查所有病理表格后,933例患者(63%)有关于ECS存在与否的信息。ECS存在率为49.5%。中位随访时间为10年。

结果

在单因素分析中,ECS与无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)较差相关。在对肿瘤大小、血管侵犯、手术类型和年龄组进行校正的多因素分析中,ECS仍然具有显著性(DFS:风险比,1.61;95%可信区间,1.34至1.93;P <.0001;OS:1.67;95%可信区间,1.34至2.08;P <.0001)。然而,当加入阳性淋巴结数量时,ECS不再具有显著性。估计无ECS的患者10年内局部区域失败率±远处失败率(LRF±远处失败率)为19%(±2%),有ECS的患者为27%(±2%)。在单因素分析中差异具有统计学显著性,但在对阳性淋巴结数量进行校正后则不然。在382例接受乳腺切除未放疗的LN1 - 3 +患者亚组中,未证实ECS对DFS、OS或LRF有独立影响。

结论

我们的结果不支持ECS具有独立的预后价值,也不支持其作为接受经典CMF治疗的LN1 - 3 +绝经前患者放疗指征的应用。然而,我们无法研究广泛的ECS是否具有预后重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验