Suppr超能文献

单次脱髓鞘事件后患者使用阿沃尼克(干扰素β-1a)的经济学评估。

Economic evaluation of Avonex (interferon beta-Ia) in patients following a single demyelinating event.

作者信息

Iskedjian Michael, Walker John H, Gray Trevor, Vicente Colin, Einarson Thomas R, Gehshan Adel

机构信息

PharmIdeas Research and Consulting Inc., 1175 North Service Road West, Suite 211, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2005 Oct;11(5):542-51. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1211oa.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interferon beta-Ia (Avonex) 30 microg, intramuscular (i.m.), once weekly is efficacious in delaying clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) following a single demyelinating event (SDE). This study determined the cost effectiveness of Avonex compared to current treatment in delaying the onset of CDMS.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA) were performed from Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal perspectives. For CEA, the outcome of interest was time spent in the pre-CDMS state, termed monosymptomatic life years (MLY) gained. For CUA, the outcome was quality-adjusted monosymptomatic life years (QAMLY) gained. A Markov model was developed with transitional probabilities and utilities derived from the literature. Costs were reported in 2002 Canadian dollars. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 5%. The time horizon was 12 years for the CEA, and 15 years for the CUA. All uncertainties were tested via univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the CEA, the incremental cost of Avonex per ILYgained was $53110 and $44789 from MoH and societal perspectives, respectively. In the CUA, the incremental cost of Avonex per QAMLY gained was $227586 and $189286 from MoH and societal perspectives, respectively. Both models were sensitive to the probability of progressing to CDMS and the analytical time horizon. The CUA was sensitive to the utilities value.

CONCLUSION

Avonex may be considered as a reasonably cost-effective approach to treatment of patients experiencing an SDE In addition, the overall incremental cost-effectiveness profile of Avonex improves if treatment is initiated in pre-CDMS rather than waiting until CDMS.

摘要

背景

干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼单抗)30微克,肌肉注射,每周一次,对于单次脱髓鞘事件(SDE)后延缓临床确诊的多发性硬化症(CDMS)有效。本研究确定了与当前治疗方法相比,阿沃尼单抗在延缓CDMS发病方面的成本效益。

方法

从卫生部(MoH)和社会角度进行了成本效益分析(CEA)和成本效用分析(CUA)。对于CEA,感兴趣的结果是处于CDMS前状态所花费的时间,称为获得的单症状生命年(MLY)。对于CUA,结果是获得的质量调整单症状生命年(QAMLY)。开发了一个马尔可夫模型,其转移概率和效用值来自文献。成本以2002年加元报告。成本和结果按5%进行贴现。CEA的时间范围为12年,CUA的时间范围为15年。所有不确定性均通过单变量和多变量敏感性分析进行检验。

结果

在CEA中,从卫生部和社会角度来看,每获得1个ILY,阿沃尼单抗的增量成本分别为53110美元和44789美元。在CUA中,从卫生部和社会角度来看,每获得1个QAMLY,阿沃尼单抗的增量成本分别为227586美元和189286美元。两个模型都对进展为CDMS 的概率和分析时间范围敏感。CUA对效用值敏感。

结论

阿沃尼单抗可被视为治疗经历SDE患者的一种合理的成本效益方法。此外,如果在CDMS前而不是等到CDMS时开始治疗,阿沃尼单抗的总体增量成本效益情况会有所改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验