Wu Jin-song, Zhou Liang-fu, Chen Wei, Lang Li-qin, Liang Wei-min, Gao Ge-jun, Mao Ying
Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Sep 1;43(17):1141-5.
To compare the relation between the preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) technique and intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring for cortical mapping of primary motor cortex in patients with tumors near the central area. And to determine whether non-invasive preoperative fMRI can provide results equivalent to those achieved with the invasive neurosurgical "gold standard".
A prospective study of 16 patients with various pathological tumors of the central area was conducted. Preoperative fMRI scans using the BOLD contrast technique in each patient were performed. An activation scan was achieved by using a motor task paradigm, which consisted of simple flexion-extension finger movements and finger-to-thumb touching in a repeating pattern. The anatomical structure was delineated by the T(1)-weighted three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled sequence (3D/FSPGR) immediately afterward. The BOLD images were overlaid on the T(1)-weighted 3D/FSPGR images, and then co-registered to the neuronavigation system. The fMRI activations were documented by using a neuronavigation system in sequence, and compared to standardized intraoperative MEP monitoring, which included direct cortical electrical stimulation (DCES) or transcranial cortical electrical stimulation (TCES) or their combination. The compound muscle action potentials of forearm flexor and hand muscle responses were recorded during either TCES or DCES. Two techniques were compared to determine the accuracy for cortical mapping of primary motor areas with fMRI.
Overall, the intraoperative MEP monitoring showed good correlation with fMRI activation in 92.3% of cases. The coincidence rate, however, was 100.0% between TCES and fMRI, and 66.7% between DCES and fMRI respectively. There was no statistically difference between two cortical mapping techniques, chi-square test of paired comparison of enumeration data, P < 0.01.
BOLD fMRI was a high sensitive and reliable technique to locate the position of the primary motor areas and their spatial relation with adjacent tumor, especially for the presurgical planning in patients with central area brain tumor.
比较术前采用血氧水平依赖(BOLD)技术的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)与术中运动诱发电位(MEP)监测在中央区附近肿瘤患者初级运动皮层映射中的关系。并确定术前非侵入性fMRI能否提供与侵入性神经外科“金标准”相当的结果。
对16例患有各种中央区病理性肿瘤的患者进行前瞻性研究。对每位患者进行使用BOLD对比技术的术前fMRI扫描。通过使用运动任务范式进行激活扫描,该范式由简单的手指屈伸运动和手指与拇指触碰的重复模式组成。随后立即用T(1)加权三维快速扰相梯度回波序列(3D/FSPGR)描绘解剖结构。将BOLD图像叠加在T(1)加权3D/FSPGR图像上,然后与神经导航系统进行配准。使用神经导航系统依次记录fMRI激活情况,并与标准化术中MEP监测进行比较,标准化术中MEP监测包括直接皮层电刺激(DCES)或经颅皮层电刺激(TCES)或两者结合。在TCES或DCES期间记录前臂屈肌和手部肌肉反应的复合肌肉动作电位。比较两种技术以确定fMRI对初级运动区皮层映射的准确性。
总体而言,术中MEP监测在92.3%的病例中与fMRI激活显示出良好的相关性。然而,TCES与fMRI之间的符合率为100.0%,DCES与fMRI之间的符合率分别为66.7%。两种皮层映射技术之间无统计学差异,计数资料配对比较卡方检验,P<0.01。
BOLD fMRI是一种高灵敏度和可靠的技术,可用于定位初级运动区的位置及其与相邻肿瘤的空间关系,尤其适用于中央区脑肿瘤患者的术前规划。