Hauser Victor L, Gimon Dianna M, Bonta James V, Howell Terry A, Malone Robert W, Williams Jimmy R
Victor L. Hauser, P.E., 13214 Hunters Breeze, San Antonio, Texas 78230, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Sep 15;39(18):7226-33. doi: 10.1021/es048020e.
The technology used in landfill covers is changing, and an alternative cover called the evapotranspiration (ET) landfill cover is coming into use. Important design requirements are prescribed by Federal rules and regulations for conventional landfill covers but not for ET landfill covers. There is no accepted hydrologic model for ET landfill cover design. This paper describes ET cover requirements and design issues, and assesses the accuracy of the EPIC and HELP hydrologic models when used for hydrologic design of ET covers. We tested the models against high-quality field measurements available from lysimeters maintained by the Agricultural Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture at Coshocton, Ohio, and Bushland, Texas. The HELP model produced substantial errors in estimating hydrologic variables. The EPIC model estimated ET and deep percolation with errors less than 7% and 5%, respectively, and accurately matched extreme events with an error of less than 2% of precipitation. The EPIC model is suitable for use in hydrologic design of ET landfill covers.
垃圾填埋场覆盖层所使用的技术正在发生变化,一种名为蒸散(ET)垃圾填埋场覆盖层的替代覆盖层正在投入使用。联邦法规对传统垃圾填埋场覆盖层规定了重要的设计要求,但对ET垃圾填埋场覆盖层却没有。目前尚无公认的用于ET垃圾填埋场覆盖层设计的水文模型。本文描述了ET覆盖层的要求和设计问题,并评估了EPIC和HELP水文模型用于ET覆盖层水文设计时的准确性。我们根据美国农业部农业研究局在俄亥俄州科肖克顿和得克萨斯州布什兰维护的蒸渗仪提供的高质量现场测量数据对这些模型进行了测试。HELP模型在估算水文变量时产生了大量误差。EPIC模型估算的蒸散量和深层渗滤量误差分别小于7%和5%,并且能以小于降水量2%的误差准确匹配极端事件。EPIC模型适用于ET垃圾填埋场覆盖层的水文设计。