Suppr超能文献

一项针对65岁及以上人群检测心房颤动的系统筛查(针对性筛查和全人群筛查)与常规做法的随机对照试验及成本效益研究。SAFE研究。

A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study.

作者信息

Hobbs F D R, Fitzmaurice D A, Mant J, Murray E, Jowett S, Bryan S, Raftery J, Davies M, Lip G

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Oct;9(40):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-74. doi: 10.3310/hta9400.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most cost-effective method of screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the population aged 65 years and over, as well as its prevalence and incidence in this age group. Also to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of different methods of recording and interpreting the electrocardiogram (ECG) within a screening programme.

DESIGN

Multicentred randomised controlled trial. Purposefully selected general practices were randomly allocated to 25 intervention practices and 25 control practices.

SETTING

Fifty primary care centres across the West Midlands, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 65 years and over.

INTERVENTIONS

GPs and practice nurses in the intervention practices received education on the importance of AF detection and ECG interpretation. Patients in the intervention practices were randomly allocated to systematic (n = 5000) or opportunistic screening (n = 5000). Prospective identification of pre-existing risk factors for AF within the screened population enabled comparison between targeted screening of people at higher risk of AF and total population screening.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AF detection rates in systematically screened and opportunistically screened populations in the intervention practices were compared with AF detection rate in 5000 patients in the control practices. The screening period was 12 months.

RESULTS

Baseline prevalence of AF was 7.2%, with a higher prevalence in males (7.8%) and patients aged 75 years and over (10.3%). The control population demonstrated higher baseline prevalence (7.9%) than either the systematic (6.9%) or opportunistic (6.9%) intervention population. In the control population 47 new cases were detected (incidence 1.04% per year). In the opportunistic arm 243 patients without a baseline diagnosis of AF were found to have an irregular pulse, with 177 having an ECG, yielding 31 new cases (incidence 0.69% per year). A further 44 cases were detected outside the screening programme (overall incidence 1.64% per year). In the systematic arm 2357 patients had an ECG yielding 52 new cases (incidence 1.1% per year). Of these, 31 were detected by targeted screening and a further 21 by total population screening. A further 22 cases were detected outside the screening programme (overall incidence 1.62% per year). In terms of ECG interpretation, computerised decision support software (CDSS) gave a sensitivity of 87.3%, a specificity of 99.1% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.5% compared with the gold standard (cardiologist reporting). GPs and practice nurses performed less well. The only difference in performance between intervention populations and controls was that practice nurses from the control arm performed less well than with intervention practice nurses on interpretation of limb-lead (PPV 38.8% versus 20.8%) and single-lead (PPV 37.7% versus 24.0%) ECGs. The within-trial economic evaluation results showed the lowest incremental cost to be for the opportunistic arm, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 337 pounds Sterling for each additional case detected compared to the control arm. Opportunistic screening dominated both more intensive screening strategies. Model-based analyses showed small differences in cost and quality-adjusted life-years for different methods and intensities of screening, but annual opportunistic screening resulted in the lowest number of ischaemic strokes and greatest proportion of cases of AF diagnosed. Probabilistic sensitivity results indicated that there was a probability of approximately 60% that screening from the age of 65 years was cost-effective in both men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study indicated that in terms of a screening programme for atrial fibrillation in patients 65 and over, the only strategy that improved on routine practice was opportunistic screening, model-based analyses indicated that there was a probability of approximately 60% of annual opportunistic screening being cost effective. It is suggested that the following topics are worthy of further investigation: the effect of the implementation of a screening programme for AF on the uptake and maintenance of anticoagulation in patients aged 65 years and over; an evaluation of the role of CDSS in the diagnosis of cardiac arrythmias; the best method for routinely detecting paroxysmal AF; ways of improving healthcare professionals' performance in ECG interpretation; development of a robust economic model to incorporate data on new therapeutic agents for use as thromboprophylactic agents for patients with AF, and an evaluation of the relative risk of stroke for patients with incident as opposed to prevalent AF.

摘要

目的

确定65岁及以上人群筛查心房颤动(AF)最具成本效益的方法,以及该年龄组中心房颤动的患病率和发病率。同时评估筛查项目中不同心电图(ECG)记录和解读方法的相对成本效益。

设计

多中心随机对照试验。特意挑选的全科医疗诊所被随机分配到25个干预诊所和25个对照诊所。

地点

英国西米德兰兹郡的50个初级保健中心。

参与者

65岁及以上的患者。

干预措施

干预诊所的全科医生和执业护士接受了关于心房颤动检测和心电图解读重要性的培训。干预诊所的患者被随机分配到系统性筛查组(n = 5000)或机会性筛查组(n = 5000)。对筛查人群中预先存在的心房颤动危险因素进行前瞻性识别,以便比较针对心房颤动高危人群的靶向筛查和总人口筛查。

主要观察指标

将干预诊所中系统性筛查人群和机会性筛查人群的心房颤动检测率与对照诊所中5000名患者的心房颤动检测率进行比较。筛查期为12个月。

结果

心房颤动基线患病率为7.2%,男性患病率较高(7.8%),75岁及以上患者患病率更高(10.3%)。对照人群的基线患病率(7.9%)高于系统性筛查组(6.9%)和机会性筛查组(6.9%)。在对照人群中检测到47例新病例(年发病率1.04%)。在机会性筛查组中,243例无基线心房颤动诊断的患者被发现脉搏不规则,其中177例进行了心电图检查,发现31例新病例(年发病率0.69%)。在筛查项目之外又检测到44例病例(总年发病率1.64%)。在系统性筛查组中,2357例患者进行了心电图检查,发现52例新病例(年发病率1.1%)。其中,31例通过靶向筛查发现,另外21例通过总人口筛查发现。在筛查项目之外又检测到22例病例(总年发病率1.62%)。就心电图解读而言,与金标准(心脏病专家报告)相比,计算机化决策支持软件(CDSS)的敏感性为87.3%,特异性为99.1%,阳性预测值(PPV)为89.5%。全科医生和执业护士的表现较差。干预人群和对照人群之间唯一的表现差异在于,对照诊所的执业护士在肢体导联心电图(PPV 38.8%对20.8%)和单导联心电图(PPV 37.7%对24.0%)解读方面的表现不如干预诊所的执业护士。试验中的经济评估结果显示,机会性筛查组的增量成本最低,与对照组相比,每多检测出一例病例的增量成本效益比为337英镑。机会性筛查优于两种更密集的筛查策略。基于模型的分析表明,不同筛查方法和强度在成本和质量调整生命年方面存在微小差异,但年度机会性筛查导致缺血性中风数量最少,心房颤动诊断病例比例最高。概率敏感性结果表明,从65岁开始筛查在男性和女性中具有成本效益的概率约为60%。

结论

研究结果表明,就65岁及以上患者的心房颤动筛查项目而言,唯一比常规做法有所改进的策略是机会性筛查,基于模型的分析表明,年度机会性筛查具有成本效益的概率约为60%。建议对以下主题进行进一步研究:实施心房颤动筛查项目对65岁及以上患者抗凝治疗的接受和维持情况的影响;评估计算机化决策支持软件在心律失常诊断中的作用;常规检测阵发性心房颤动的最佳方法;提高医疗专业人员心电图解读表现的方法;开发一个强大的经济模型,纳入用于心房颤动患者血栓预防的新治疗药物的数据,以及评估新发心房颤动与既往心房颤动患者中风的相对风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验