Vander Cruyssen Bert, Van Looy Stijn, Wyns Bart, Westhovens Rene, Durez Patrick, Van den Bosch Filip, Veys Eric M, Mielants Herman, De Clerck Luc, Peretz Anne, Malaise Michel, Verbruggen Leon, Vastesaeger Nathan, Geldhof Anja, Boullart Luc, De Keyser Filip
Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(5):R1063-71. doi: 10.1186/ar1787. Epub 2005 Jul 8.
This study is based on an expanded access program in which 511 patients suffering from active refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with intravenous infusions of infliximab (3 mg/kg+methotrexate (MTX)) at weeks 0, 2, 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter. At week 22, 474 patients were still in follow-up, of whom 102 (21.5%), who were not optimally responding to treatment, received a dose increase from week 30 onward. We aimed to build a model to discriminate the decision to give a dose increase. This decision was based on the treating rheumatologist's clinical judgment and therefore can be considered as a clinical measure of insufficient response. Different single and composite measures at weeks 0, 6, 14 and 22, and their differences over time were taken into account for the model building. Ranking of the continuous variables based on areas under the curve of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, displayed the momentary DAS28 (Disease Activity Score including a 28-joint count) as the most important discriminating variable. Subsequently, we proved that the response scores and the changes over time were less important than the momentary evaluations to discriminate the physician's decision. The final model we thus obtained was a model with only slightly better discriminative characteristics than the DAS28. Finally, we fitted a discriminant function using the single variables of the DAS28. This displayed similar scores and coefficients as the DAS28. In conclusion, we evaluated different variables and models to discriminate the treating rheumatologist's decision to increase the dose of infliximab (+MTX), which indicates an insufficient response to infliximab at 3 mg/kg in patients with RA. We proved that the momentary DAS28 score correlates best with this decision and demonstrated the robustness of the score and the coefficients of the DAS28 in a cohort of RA patients under infliximab therapy.
本研究基于一项扩大准入计划,511例活动性难治性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者在第0、2、6周接受英夫利昔单抗静脉输注(3mg/kg + 甲氨蝶呤(MTX))治疗,此后每8周输注一次。在第22周时,474例患者仍在随访中,其中102例(21.5%)对治疗反应不佳,从第30周起接受剂量增加治疗。我们旨在建立一个模型来区分剂量增加的决策。该决策基于治疗风湿科医生的临床判断,因此可被视为反应不足的临床指标。在模型构建中考虑了第0、6、14和22周时不同的单一和综合指标及其随时间的变化。基于受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析的曲线下面积对连续变量进行排序,结果显示瞬时DAS28(包括28个关节计数的疾病活动评分)是最重要的区分变量。随后,我们证明,在区分医生的决策方面,反应评分和随时间的变化不如瞬时评估重要。我们最终得到的模型与DAS28相比,其区分特征仅略好。最后,我们使用DAS28的单一变量拟合了一个判别函数。其显示出与DAS28相似的分数和系数。总之,我们评估了不同变量和模型,以区分治疗风湿科医生增加英夫利昔单抗(+MTX)剂量的决策,这表明RA患者对3mg/kg英夫利昔单抗反应不足。我们证明瞬时DAS28评分与该决策相关性最佳,并在接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的RA患者队列中证明了DAS28评分和系数的稳健性。