Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚靶控输注期间脑状态指数与脑电双频指数的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of the cerebral state index and the bispectral index during target-controlled infusion of propofol.

作者信息

Zhong T, Guo Q L, Pang Y D, Peng L F, Li C L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central Southern University, Changsha 410008, China.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2005 Dec;95(6):798-802. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei253. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cerebral state index (CSI) has recently been introduced as an intra-operative monitor of anaesthetic depth. We compared the performance of the CSI to the bispectral index (BIS) in measuring depth of anaesthesia during target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol.

METHODS

Twenty Chinese patients undergoing general anaesthesia were recruited. CSI and BIS, and predicted effect-site concentration of propofol were recorded. The level of sedation was tested by Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAAS) every 20 s during stepwise increase (TCI, 0.5 microg ml(-1)) of propofol. The loss of verbal contact (LVC) and loss of response (LOR) were defined by MOAAS values of 2-3 and less than 2, respectively. Baseline variability and the prediction probability (P(K)) were calculated for the BIS and CSI. The values of BIS(05) and CSI(05), BIS(50) and CSI(50), BIS(95) and CSI(95) were calculated at each end-point (LVC and LOR).

RESULTS

Baseline variability of CSI was more than that of BIS. Both CSI and BIS showed a high prediction probability for the steps awake vs LVC, awake vs LOR, and LVC vs LOR, and good correlations with MOAAS values.

CONCLUSION

Despite larger baseline variation, CSI performed as well as BIS in terms of P(K) values and correlations with step changes in sedation.

摘要

背景

脑状态指数(CSI)最近被引入作为麻醉深度的术中监测指标。我们比较了在丙泊酚靶控输注(TCI)期间,CSI与脑电双频指数(BIS)在测量麻醉深度方面的性能。

方法

招募20例接受全身麻醉的中国患者。记录CSI、BIS以及丙泊酚的预测效应室浓度。在丙泊酚逐步增加(TCI,0.5μg ml⁻¹)期间,每20秒通过改良的观察者警觉/镇静评分量表(MOAAS)测试镇静水平。言语接触消失(LVC)和反应消失(LOR)分别由MOAAS值2 - 3和小于2定义。计算BIS和CSI的基线变异性以及预测概率(P(K))。在每个终点(LVC和LOR)计算BIS(05)和CSI(05)、BIS(50)和CSI(50)、BIS(95)和CSI(95)的值。

结果

CSI的基线变异性大于BIS。CSI和BIS在清醒与LVC、清醒与LOR以及LVC与LOR的步骤中均显示出较高的预测概率,并且与MOAAS值具有良好的相关性。

结论

尽管基线变化较大,但在P(K)值以及与镇静步骤变化的相关性方面,CSI与BIS表现相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验