Zeru Allelign, Schäfer Gerhard
Institut de Mécanique des Fluides et Solides de Strasbourg, Institut Franco-Allemand de Recherche sur l'Environnement (IFARE), UMR 7507 ULP-CNRS, 23 rue du Loess, B.P. 20, F-67037 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
J Contam Hydrol. 2005 Dec;81(1-4):106-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
When only few monitoring wells are available to assess the extent and level of groundwater contamination, inversion of concentration breakthrough curves acquired during an integral pumping test can be used as an alternative quantification method. The idea is to use concentration-time series recorded during integral pumping tests through an inversion technique to estimate contaminant mass fluxes crossing a control plane. In this paper, we examine how a longitudinal concentration gradient along a contaminant plume length scale affects the estimated inversed-concentration distribution and its associated mass flux. The analytically inversed-concentration distribution at the imaginary control plane (ICP) is compared to a numerically generated concentration distribution, treating the latter one as a "real contaminant plume" characterized by the presence of a longitudinal concentration gradient. It is found that the analytically inversed-concentration can lead to overestimation or underestimation of concentration distribution values depending on the transport time period and dispersivity values. At lower dispersivity values, with shorter transport time periods, the analytically inversed-concentration distribution overestimates the "real" concentration distribution. A better fit of the estimated concentration distribution to the "real" one is observed when the transport time period increases, i.e. when the advective front has already crossed the ICP. However, for higher dispersivity values, underestimation of the real concentration distribution is observed. Deviation of the inversed-concentration distribution from the "real" one is assessed for a site-specific concentration gradient term. A concentration gradient adjusted contaminant mass flux is thus formulated to evaluate groundwater contamination levels at a given time period through an ICP. This concentration gradient ratio can indicate whether the ICP is well positioned to evaluate accurately contaminant mass fluxes which are representative of groundwater contamination levels.
当仅有少数监测井可用于评估地下水污染的范围和程度时,在整体抽水试验期间获取的浓度突破曲线反演可作为一种替代的量化方法。其思路是通过反演技术利用在整体抽水试验期间记录的浓度时间序列来估算穿过控制平面的污染物质量通量。在本文中,我们研究了沿污染物羽状体长度尺度的纵向浓度梯度如何影响估计的反演浓度分布及其相关的质量通量。将假想控制平面(ICP)处的解析反演浓度分布与数值生成的浓度分布进行比较,将后者视为以存在纵向浓度梯度为特征的“真实污染物羽状体”。结果发现,根据运移时间段和弥散度值,解析反演浓度可能导致浓度分布值的高估或低估。在较低的弥散度值和较短的运移时间段下,解析反演浓度分布高估了“真实”浓度分布。当运移时间段增加时,即当平流前沿已经穿过ICP时,可以观察到估计的浓度分布与“真实”浓度分布的拟合更好。然而,对于较高的弥散度值,会观察到对真实浓度分布的低估。针对特定场地的浓度梯度项评估反演浓度分布与“真实”浓度分布的偏差。因此,制定了浓度梯度调整后的污染物质量通量,以通过ICP评估给定时间段内的地下水污染水平。该浓度梯度比可以表明ICP是否处于能够准确评估代表地下水污染水平的污染物质量通量的良好位置。