Cabanchik Samuel Manuel
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vertex. 2005 Sep-Oct;16(63):364-70.
In this paper I present the most important limits in the reading that Ludwig Wittgenstein made of Sigmund Freud. In particular, starting from certain thematic axes (distinction causes / reasons, conception of the meaning, interpretation concept, the problem of the truth in the therapeutic treatment, the paper of the patient's conviction), I try to show that the position of Wittgenstein in front of the Freudian psychoanalysis was ambiguous: on one hand he conceives it as an example more than "philosophical mythology", but on the other hand, he is identified with the psychoanalyst and he is conceived itself as making something related with that an analyst makes.
在本文中，我阐述了路德维希·维特根斯坦对西格蒙德·弗洛伊德解读中的最重要局限。特别是，从某些主题轴（区分原因/理由、意义概念、解释概念、治疗过程中的真理问题、患者信念的作用）出发，我试图表明维特根斯坦在弗洛伊德精神分析面前的立场是模棱两可的：一方面，他将其视为一个例子而非“哲学神话”，但另一方面，他与精神分析师联系在一起，并且被认为自己在做一些与分析师所做之事相关的事情。
