Lee Michael A, Corbisiero Raffaele, Nabert David R, Coman James A, Giudici Michael C, Tomassoni Gery F, Turk Kyong T, Breiter David J, Zhang Yunlong
John Muir/Mt. Diablo Health Systems, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Oct;28(10):1032-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00219.x.
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has many characteristics that are similar to ventricular tachycardia (VT). This presents a significant challenge for the SVT-detection algorithms of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). A newly developed ICD, which utilizes a Vector Timing and Correlation algorithm as well as interval-based conventional SVT discrimination algorithms (Rhythm ID), was evaluated in this study.
This study was a prospective, multicenter trial that evaluated 96 patients implanted with an ICD at 21 U.S. centers. All patients were followed at 2 weeks, 1 month, and every 3 months post implant. A manual Rhythm ID reference vector was acquired prior to any arrhythmia induction. During testing, atrial tachyarrhythmias were induced first, followed by ventricular arrhythmia induction. Induced and spontaneous SVT and VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes recorded during the trial were annotated by physician investigators.
The mean age of the patients implanted with an ICD was 67.3 +/- 10.8 years. Eighty-one percent of patients were male. The primary cardiovascular disease was coronary artery disease, and the primary tachyarrhythmia was monomorphic VT. Implementation of the Rhythm ID algorithm did not affect the VT/VF detection time. There were a total of 370 ventricular tachyarrhythmias (277 induced and 93 spontaneous) and 441 SVT episodes (168 induced and 273 spontaneous). Sensitivity for ventricular tachyarrhythmias was 100%, and specificity for SVT was 92% (94% and 91% for induced and spontaneous SVT, respectively). All patients had a successful manual Rhythm ID acquisition prior to atrial tachyarrhythmia induction. At the 1-month follow-up, the Rhythm ID references were updated automatically an average of 167.8 +/- 122.7 times. Stored Rhythm ID references correlated to patients' normally conducted rhythm 100% at 2 weeks, and 98% at 1 month.
The Rhythm ID algorithm achieved 100% sensitivity for VT/VF, and 92% specificity for SVT. The manual and automatic Rhythm ID update algorithms successfully acquired references, and the updated references were highly accurate.
室上性心动过速(SVT)具有许多与室性心动过速(VT)相似的特征。这给植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的SVT检测算法带来了重大挑战。本研究对一种新开发的ICD进行了评估,该ICD采用了矢量定时和相关算法以及基于间期的传统SVT鉴别算法(心律识别)。
本研究是一项前瞻性多中心试验,评估了在美国21个中心植入ICD的96例患者。所有患者在植入后2周、1个月及每3个月进行随访。在诱发任何心律失常之前获取手动心律识别参考矢量。在测试过程中,首先诱发房性快速心律失常,然后诱发室性心律失常。试验期间记录的诱发和自发的SVT及VT/心室颤动(VF)发作由医师研究人员进行注释。
植入ICD的患者平均年龄为67.3±10.8岁。81%的患者为男性。主要心血管疾病为冠状动脉疾病,主要快速心律失常为单形性VT。心律识别算法的实施不影响VT/VF检测时间。共有370次室性快速心律失常(277次诱发和93次自发)和441次SVT发作(168次诱发和273次自发)。室性快速心律失常的敏感性为100%,SVT的特异性为92%(诱发和自发SVT分别为94%和91%)。所有患者在诱发房性快速心律失常之前均成功获取了手动心律识别结果。在1个月的随访中,心律识别参考值平均自动更新167.8±122.7次。存储的心律识别参考值在2周时与患者的正常传导心律100%相关,在1个月时与患者的正常传导心律98%相关。
心律识别算法对VT/VF的敏感性达到100%,对SVT的特异性达到92%。手动和自动心律识别更新算法成功获取了参考值,且更新后的参考值高度准确。