US progressives fight for a voice in bioethics.
作者信息
Check Erika
出版信息
Nature. 2005 Oct 13;437(7061):932-3. doi: 10.1038/437932a.
DOI:10.1038/437932a
PMID:16222258
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
US progressives fight for a voice in bioethics.
Nature. 2005 Oct 13;437(7061):932-3. doi: 10.1038/437932a.
2
Bioethics: dial 'E' for ethics.
Nature. 2006 Apr 27;440(7088):1104-5. doi: 10.1038/4401104a.
3
Bioethics: role of religion cannot be ignored.
Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):763. doi: 10.1038/425763b.
4
Bioethics needs a distinct voice if it is to aid science.
Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):763. doi: 10.1038/425763a.
5
"Who lost China?" A foreshadowing of today's ideological disputes in bioethics.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 May-Jun;35(3):12-3.
6
The end of the Great Bioethics Compromise.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Jan-Feb;35(1):14-5.
7
Human cloning and scientific corruption: the South Korea scandal and the future of the stem cell debate.
New Atlantis. 2006 Winter;11:113-7.
8
Personalities, politics, and bioethics.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(12):1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.642252.
9
Ideology and politicization in public bioethics.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jan;20(1):73-84. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000630.
10
"I want to live": medicine betrayed by ideology in the political debate over Terri Schiavo.
Stetson Law Rev. 2005 Fall;35(1):49-80.
引用本文的文献
1
Politics, bioethics, and science policy.
HEC Forum. 2008 Mar;20(1):29-47. doi: 10.1007/s10730-008-9062-9.
Zotero 插件