Suppr超能文献

评估促红细胞生成剂在肿瘤治疗中治疗贫血的效果。

Evaluating erythropoietic agents for the treatment of anaemia in the oncology setting.

作者信息

Gascón Pere

机构信息

Hospital Clinic, Division of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Institut Clinic Malalties Hemato-Oncològiques (ICMHO), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2005 Nov;41(17):2601-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.046. Epub 2005 Oct 14.

Abstract

Anaemia is a common complication of cancer and its treatment. It is also associated with substantial impairment of patient quality of life (QOL). Erythropoietic agents are primary treatment options for cancer-related anaemia (CRA). This review summarises evidence supporting clinical use of the approved erythropoietic agents (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa). A MEDLINE((R)) search from January 2000 to September 2004 using the search terms "epoetin alfa," "epoetin beta," "darbepoetin alfa," "erythropoietin," and "anaemia" was conducted to identify studies evaluating erythropoietic agents in the treatment of CRA. Recent presentations at professional meetings were also included. Erythropoietic agents increase haemoglobin levels, decrease transfusion requirements, and improve QOL in patients with CRA. However, variations in study design, patient populations, dose titration schedules, and outcome measures among available studies make data comparisons between clinical trials difficult. Head-to-head trials are comparing erythropoietic agents in a randomised setting; other trials are evaluating optimal dosage schedules. Clinically relevant differences among approved erythropoietic agents have not been determined in direct comparative trials; however, epoetin alfa appears to be at least as effective as darbepoetin alfa in treatment of CRA.

摘要

贫血是癌症及其治疗的常见并发症。它还与患者生活质量(QOL)的严重受损相关。促红细胞生成剂是治疗癌症相关性贫血(CRA)的主要选择。本综述总结了支持已批准的促红细胞生成剂(阿法依泊汀、β-依泊汀、达贝泊汀α)临床应用的证据。利用搜索词“阿法依泊汀”、“β-依泊汀”、“达贝泊汀α”、“促红细胞生成素”和“贫血”对2000年1月至2004年9月的MEDLINE((R))进行检索,以识别评估促红细胞生成剂治疗CRA的研究。专业会议上最近的报告也被纳入。促红细胞生成剂可提高CRA患者的血红蛋白水平,减少输血需求,并改善生活质量。然而,现有研究在研究设计、患者群体、剂量滴定方案和结局指标方面存在差异,使得临床试验之间的数据比较变得困难。头对头试验正在随机环境中比较促红细胞生成剂;其他试验正在评估最佳剂量方案。在直接比较试验中尚未确定已批准的促红细胞生成剂之间的临床相关差异;然而,阿法依泊汀在治疗CRA方面似乎至少与达贝泊汀α一样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验