Suppr超能文献

皮肤肿瘤学的计算机辅助培训——比较电子学习程序与面对面教学的初步报告

[Computer-based training in dermatooncology--a preliminary report comparing electronic learning programs with face-to-face teaching].

作者信息

Smolle Josef, Staber Reinhard, Neges Heide, Reibnegger Gilbert, Kerl Helmut

机构信息

Univ.-Klinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 8, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Nov;3(11):883-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2005.05758.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic media are increasingly used in medical education. The question arises whether tutorial programs are as effective as innovative face-to-face didactic formats.

METHODS

26 students underwent a special dermatooncology course in an integrated undergraduate medical curriculum. One part of the content was acquired face-to-face with emphasis on team learning and mini-lectures; the other part was presented as web-based electronic computer-based training objects. The performance of the students in a subsequent multiple choice test was evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, questions referring to computer-based training contents were answered correctly in 90.4 +/- 12.5 %, which was significantly superior to the questions referring to team learning in the face-to-face teaching format (80.6 +/- 13.1 %; p < 0.001). There was, however, a significant correlation between both results for each individual student (r = 0.52; p < 0.01), but there was no correlation between the results obtained for computer-based training or team learning on the one hand, and the overall performance of the individual student on the other.

CONCLUSIONS

Though different contents were concerned, our study provides evidence that computer-based training may be more efficient than face-to-face teaching using team learning to communicate dermatooncology contents in an undergraduate medical curriculum.

摘要

背景

电子媒体在医学教育中的应用日益广泛。由此产生的问题是,辅导课程是否与创新的面对面教学形式一样有效。

方法

26名学生在本科医学综合课程中参加了一门特殊的皮肤肿瘤学课程。课程内容的一部分通过面对面教学获取,重点是团队学习和小型讲座;另一部分则以基于网络的电子计算机培训对象的形式呈现。对学生在随后的多项选择题测试中的表现进行了评估。

结果

总体而言,涉及基于计算机培训内容的问题回答正确率为90.4±12.5%,显著高于面对面教学形式中涉及团队学习的问题(80.6±13.1%;p<0.001)。然而,每个学生的这两个结果之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.52;p<0.01),但一方面基于计算机培训或团队学习获得的结果与另一方面单个学生的整体表现之间没有相关性。

结论

尽管涉及不同的内容,但我们的研究提供了证据,表明在本科医学课程中,使用基于计算机的培训来传授皮肤肿瘤学内容可能比采用团队学习的面对面教学更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验