Suppr超能文献

使用骨基准标记物进行无框架立体定向术以用于脑深部刺激。

Frameless stereotaxy using bone fiducial markers for deep brain stimulation.

作者信息

Holloway Kathryn L, Gaede Steven E, Starr Philip A, Rosenow Joshua M, Ramakrishnan Viswanathan, Henderson Jaimie M

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Virginia Hospital of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2005 Sep;103(3):404-13. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0404.

Abstract

OBJECT

Functional neurosurgical interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) are traditionally performed with the aid of a stereotactic frame. Although frameless techniques have been perceived as less accurate, data from a recent phantom study of a modified frameless approach demonstrated a laboratory accuracy exceeding that obtained using a common frame system. The present study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a frameless system in routine clinical use.

METHODS

Deep brain stimulation leads were implanted in 38 patients by using a skull-mounted trajectory guide and an image-guided workstation. Registration was accomplished with bone fiducial markers. Final lead positions were measured on postoperative computerized tomography scans and compared with the planned lead positions. The accuracy of the Leksell frame within the clinical situation has been reported on in a recent study; these raw data served as a comparison data set. The difference between expected and actual lead locations in the x plane was 1.4 mm in the frame-based procedure and 1.6 mm in the frameless procedure. Similarly, the difference in the y plane was 1.6 mm in the frame-based system and 1.3 mm in the frameless one. The error was greatest in the z plane, that is, 1.7 mm in the frame-based method and 2 mm in the frameless system. Multivariate analysis of variance demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of the frame-based and frameless systems was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.22). Note, however, that frameless techniques offer advantages in patient comfort, separation of imaging from surgery, and decreased operating time.

摘要

目的

功能性神经外科手术干预,如深部脑刺激(DBS),传统上是在立体定向框架的辅助下进行的。尽管无框架技术被认为准确性较低,但最近一项关于改良无框架方法的体模研究数据表明,其实验室准确性超过了使用普通框架系统所获得的准确性。本研究旨在评估一种无框架系统在常规临床应用中的准确性。

方法

使用颅骨安装的轨迹导向器和图像引导工作站,为38例患者植入深部脑刺激电极。通过骨基准标记物完成配准。在术后计算机断层扫描上测量最终电极位置,并与计划的电极位置进行比较。最近一项研究报告了Leksell框架在临床情况下的准确性;这些原始数据用作比较数据集。在基于框架的手术中,x平面上预期和实际电极位置之间的差异为1.4毫米,在无框架手术中为1.6毫米。同样,y平面上的差异在基于框架的系统中为1.6毫米,在无框架系统中为1.3毫米。误差在z平面上最大,即基于框架的方法中为1.7毫米,无框架系统中为2毫米。多变量方差分析表明两种方法的准确性没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

基于框架的系统和无框架系统的准确性在统计学上没有显著差异(p = 0.22)。然而,请注意,无框架技术在患者舒适度、成像与手术分离以及减少手术时间方面具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验