Bergh Jonas
Stockholm Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Breast. 2005 Dec;14(6):564-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.08.020. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
Adjuvant breast cancer therapy and early diagnosis will improve breast cancer outcome. The Eurocare studies have demonstrated large differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality in different regions and countries and underlined the importance of access and quality in the management of early disease. So far, the very important survival gains by adjuvant therapy have been obtained by "one fits all"--like strategies, resulting in therapy in vain for many patients and unnecessary therapy for large cohorts. Present adjuvant strategies have focused on group statistical risk analysis, mainly using tumour stage, histological grade and receptor status. Five retrospective studies have revealed a worse outcome for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy without toxicity. In one of these studies the breast cancer survival was improved by 10% for patients who received grade 2/3 neutropenia; this is equivalent to the described survival gains by the addition of anthracyclines and taxanes to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) combinations. Prospectively, this has been explored in the Scandinavian Breast Group (SBG) 9401-, SBG 2000-1- and presently in the SBG 2004-1 studies using tailored chemotherapy dosage strategies, aimed at avoiding under-dosage and diminishing acute side effects. For the future, we need several predictive factors for therapy, allowing better and more tailored therapy selections for individuals at risk. The present explorations of tumour RNA expression profiles are most likely to be useful in identifying therapy-predictive profiles for these individuals. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data reveal marked differences in effect and tolerance of used drugs. The development of single nucleotide polymorphism technology are also likely to be important for optimising dosing strategies, aiming and increasing the effect, as well as decreasing toxicity. Taken together these strategies will be very different from the present "one fits all" concept.
辅助性乳腺癌治疗和早期诊断将改善乳腺癌的治疗效果。欧洲癌症和治疗结果研究(Eurocare)表明,不同地区和国家的乳腺癌发病率和死亡率存在很大差异,并强调了早期疾病管理中可及性和质量的重要性。到目前为止,辅助治疗所带来的非常重要的生存获益是通过“一刀切”式的策略实现的,这导致许多患者接受了无效治疗,而大量人群接受了不必要的治疗。目前的辅助治疗策略主要集中在群体统计风险分析上,主要依据肿瘤分期、组织学分级和受体状态。五项回顾性研究显示,接受无毒性辅助化疗的患者预后较差。在其中一项研究中,出现2/3级中性粒细胞减少的患者乳腺癌生存率提高了10%;这与在环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)联合方案中添加蒽环类药物和紫杉烷所描述的生存获益相当。前瞻性地,斯堪的纳维亚乳腺癌研究组(SBG)9401研究、SBG 2000-1研究以及目前的SBG 2004-1研究采用了量身定制的化疗剂量策略进行了探索,旨在避免剂量不足并减少急性副作用。未来,我们需要多种治疗预测因素,以便为有风险的个体提供更好、更个性化的治疗选择。目前对肿瘤RNA表达谱的探索很可能有助于识别这些个体的治疗预测谱。药代动力学和药效学数据显示,所用药物在疗效和耐受性方面存在显著差异。单核苷酸多态性技术的发展对于优化给药策略也可能很重要,目的是提高疗效并降低毒性。综合起来,这些策略将与目前的“一刀切”概念有很大不同。