Lau Hung
Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Center, Tung Wah Hospital, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ann Surg. 2005 Nov;242(5):670-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000186440.02977.de.
To compare the clinical outcome of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) using fibrin sealant (FS) and mechanical stapling for prosthetic mesh fixation.
Similar efficacy of FS and mechanical stapling for mesh fixation has been demonstrated in a swine model, but no clinical trial has been conducted to compare the outcomes of TEP using these 2 fixation devices. FS adheres the prosthetic mesh without causing injury to the underlying structures. Whether the application of FS improves early postoperative outcomes, namely, reduction of postoperative pain and seroma formation, has not been examined.
Between July 2002 and February 2004, a total of 93 patients with 186 inguinal hernias who underwent bilateral TEP were randomized to have mesh fixation by either FS (n = 46) or mechanical stapling (n = 47). The primary endpoints were severity of pain, analgesic requirement, and incidence of seroma. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, number of days required to resume normal outdoor activities and work, recurrence rate, and incidence of chronic pain.
The 2 groups were comparable in age, sex, and types of hernia. TEP were successfully performed in all patients. The FS group consumed significantly less analgesics compared with that of the staple group (P = 0.034). There was no significant difference in the postoperative pain score at rest and on coughing from the day of operation to postoperative day 6 between the groups. The incidence of seroma was significantly higher in the FS group (17.4%) than the staple group (5.3%) (P = 0.009). Length of hospital stay and time taken to resume normal activities and work were comparable between the 2 groups. With a median follow-up of 1.2 years, no recurrent hernia has been detected in either group, but the incidence of chronic pain in the staple group (20.0%) was higher than that of the FS group (13.2%) (P = 0.418).
This randomized prospective clinical trial demonstrated a significant reduction of analgesic consumption by using FS for mesh fixation during bilateral TEP, but it was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative seroma.
比较在双侧腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)中使用纤维蛋白封闭剂(FS)和机械吻合器进行人工补片固定的临床效果。
在猪模型中已证实FS和机械吻合器在补片固定方面具有相似的疗效,但尚未进行临床试验来比较使用这两种固定装置的TEP的效果。FS可使人工补片黏附,且不会对其下方的结构造成损伤。FS的应用是否能改善术后早期结果,即减轻术后疼痛和减少血清肿形成,尚未得到研究。
2002年7月至2004年2月期间,共有93例患有186例腹股沟疝的患者接受了双侧TEP手术,并被随机分为两组,分别使用FS(n = 46)或机械吻合器(n = 47)进行补片固定。主要终点指标为疼痛严重程度、镇痛药物需求及血清肿发生率。次要终点指标为住院时间、恢复正常户外活动和工作所需天数、复发率及慢性疼痛发生率。
两组在年龄、性别和疝的类型方面具有可比性。所有患者的TEP手术均成功完成。与吻合器组相比,FS组使用的镇痛药物明显更少(P = 0.034)。两组在术后第1天至术后第6天静息和咳嗽时的疼痛评分无显著差异。FS组血清肿发生率(17.4%)明显高于吻合器组(5.3%)(P = 0.009)。两组的住院时间以及恢复正常活动和工作所需时间相当。中位随访1.2年,两组均未检测到复发性疝,但吻合器组慢性疼痛发生率(20.0%)高于FS组(13.2%)(P = 0.418)。
这项随机前瞻性临床试验表明,在双侧TEP中使用FS进行补片固定可显著减少镇痛药物的使用,但与术后血清肿发生率增加有关。