Radonjic Ivana V, Dzamic Aleksandar M, Mitrovic Sanja M, Arsic Arsenijevic Valentina S, Popadic Dusan M, Kranjcic Zec Ivana F
Department of Clinical Parasitology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Subotica 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 May 1;126(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.033. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
The aim of this study was to compare wet mount-, Giemsa stain-, acridine orange fluorescent stain-, cultivation- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches to establish which method or combination of methods was most effective in the laboratory diagnosis of trichomoniasis.
Out of 200 investigated patients with various gynecological complaints, Trichomonas vaginalis infection was detected in 27 (13.5%) by any of methods investigated. Among women with trichomonads, a typical clinical finding was presented in only nine. For analysis of sensitivity and specificity of the methods used, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve concept with culture as a gold standard was applied.
Infection was diagnosed by wet mount in 14 (7.0%) women, by Giemsa stain in 11 (5.5%) and by acridine orange stain in 16 (8.0%) women. In 21 (10.5%) women, it was diagnosed by culture in Diamond's medium, and in 22 (11.0%) by PCR. For the initial diagnosis of trichomoniasis, wet preparation is the test that is widely available in most STD clinics, but its sensitivity is poor (66.67%). Giemsa stain shows a low sensitivity of 52.38%. Acridine orange shows reasonable sensitivity and specificity of 71.43% and 99.44%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR (80.95% and 97.21%) did not exceed that of culture.
With regard to the fact that trichomoniasis can have an atypical or even asymptomatic course, in order to accurately diagnose this disease, microbiological investigation is necessary. Comparison of different methods showed that at least two techniques, such as culture and acridine orange staining, have the potential for better diagnosis of T. vaginalis infection. PCR detection of infection has been demonstrated to be highly specific and sensitive, but its availability and cost effectiveness are in question. PCR could provide an alternative for laboratory diagnosis of trichomoniasis by culture.
本研究旨在比较基于湿片法、吉姆萨染色法、吖啶橙荧光染色法、培养法和聚合酶链反应(PCR)法,以确定哪种方法或方法组合在滴虫病实验室诊断中最有效。
在200例因各种妇科症状接受调查的患者中,通过所研究的任何一种方法检测到27例(13.5%)阴道毛滴虫感染。在感染滴虫的女性中,只有9例有典型临床症状。为分析所用方法的敏感性和特异性,采用以培养法为金标准的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线概念。
14例(7.0%)女性通过湿片法诊断感染,11例(5.5%)通过吉姆萨染色法诊断,16例(8.0%)通过吖啶橙染色法诊断。21例(10.5%)女性通过在钻石培养基中培养诊断,22例(11.0%)通过PCR诊断。对于滴虫病的初步诊断,湿片法是大多数性传播疾病诊所广泛使用的检测方法,但其敏感性较差(66.67%)。吉姆萨染色法敏感性低,为52.38%。吖啶橙染色法显示出合理的敏感性和特异性,分别为71.43%和99.44%。PCR的敏感性和特异性(80.95%和97.21%)未超过培养法。
鉴于滴虫病可能有非典型甚至无症状病程,为准确诊断该病,微生物学检查是必要的。不同方法的比较表明,至少两种技术,如培养法和吖啶橙染色法,有可能更好地诊断阴道毛滴虫感染。已证明PCR检测感染具有高度特异性和敏感性,但其可用性和成本效益存在疑问。PCR可为通过培养法进行滴虫病实验室诊断提供一种替代方法。