Suppr超能文献

因接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗而转诊患者的结局(一项心肌梗死全国登记研究的2/3/4分析)

Outcome in patients transferred for percutaneous coronary intervention (a national registry of myocardial infarction 2/3/4 analysis).

作者信息

Shavelle David M, Rasouli M Leila, Frederick Paul, Gibson C Michael, French William J

机构信息

The Division of Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;96(9):1227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.061. Epub 2005 Sep 2.

Abstract

Hospital transfer is associated with delays in performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Given the limited number of interventional centers in the United States, the transfer of patients is widely practiced. We compared the outcome of patients who were transferred for primary PCI and determined whether prolonged door-to-balloon times were associated with increased mortality. Patients who presented within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent transfer for primary PCI were identified from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction database (NRMI databases 2, 3, and 4, n = 7,133). The short-term outcome of those who received early (< or =2 hours) was compared with that of those who received delayed primary PCI (>2 hours) using multivariate logistic regression analyses and propensity score methods. The door-to-balloon time for the early PCI group compared with the delayed PCI group was 99 +/- 16 versus 264 +/- 178 minutes, respectively (p <0.0001). The early PCI group had less recurrent ischemia and angina (5.8% vs 10.1%, p <0.001), less cardiogenic shock (5.1% vs 8.9%, p <0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (4.4 +/- 3.5 vs 5.4 +/- 4.7 days, p <0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower for the early PCI group than for the delayed PCI group (2.7% vs 6.2%, p < 0.001; entire cohort 5.7%). Comparison of patients matched on propensity score (n = 993) showed that mortality was lower in the early than in the delayed PCI group (2.6% vs 4.6%, p = 0.014, c-statistic 0.67). In conclusion, <4% of patients who received PCI were treated within the recommended guideline of < 120 minutes by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Door-to-balloon times <2 hours in patients who undergo transfer for PCI is associated with a significant decrease in short-term mortality, which suggests that efforts must be made to decrease transfer delays.

摘要

医院转运与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的延迟相关。鉴于美国介入中心数量有限,患者转运广泛存在。我们比较了接受转运进行直接PCI的患者的结局,并确定延长的门球时间是否与死亡率增加相关。从国家心肌梗死注册数据库(NRMI数据库2、3和4,n = 7133)中识别出在12小时内出现ST段抬高型心肌梗死并接受转运进行直接PCI的患者。使用多因素逻辑回归分析和倾向评分方法,将早期(≤2小时)接受PCI的患者的短期结局与延迟接受直接PCI(>2小时)的患者的结局进行比较。早期PCI组与延迟PCI组的门球时间分别为99±16分钟和264±178分钟(p<0.0001)。早期PCI组复发性缺血和心绞痛较少(5.8%对10.1%,p<0.001),心源性休克较少(5.1%对8.9%,p<0.001),住院时间较短(4.4±3.5天对5.4±4.7天,p<0.001)。早期PCI组的住院死亡率低于延迟PCI组(2.7%对6.2%,p<0.001;整个队列5.7%)。倾向评分匹配患者(n = 993)的比较显示,早期PCI组的死亡率低于延迟PCI组(2.6%对4.6%,p = 0.014,c统计量0.67)。总之,接受PCI治疗的患者中,<4%在接受美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会推荐的<120分钟指南内接受治疗。接受PCI转运的患者门球时间<2小时与短期死亡率显著降低相关,这表明必须努力减少转运延迟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验