Song Moon K, Rosenthal Mark J, Song Albert M, Yang Hong, Ao Yan, Yamaguchi Dean T
Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Metabolism. 2005 Nov;54(11):1480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.05.014.
Cyclo (his-pro), controlled-energy diet, soy protein hydrolysate (SPH), and raw vegetable food (RVF) are known to improve insulin sensitivity and body weight (BW) control. Enhancement of high cyclo (his-pro) content in SPH (HCS) was performed by refluxing SPH with 1 N KH(2)CO(3) dissolved in 70% ethanol for 2 weeks at room temperature. Using this material, we examined the effects of HCS plus RVF on glucose metabolism and BW control in genetically diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (G-K) and insulin-resistant aged overweight Sprague-Dawley (S-D) rats. Thirty 7-week-old G-K rats and 18 16- to 18-month-old S-D rats were divided into 3 groups and treated with normal chow (NC), RVF diet, or HCS diet for 8 weeks. Raw vegetable food diet was made of 1:3 RVF and 2:3 NC; HCS diet was made of 1:27 portion HCS, 8:27 RVF, and 2:3 NC. Oral glucose tolerance significantly improved in both RVF- (P<.01) and HCS-treated (P<.001) G-K rats and worsened in NC-fed rats compared with the baseline values. Similarly, oral glucose tolerance also improved in aged overweight S-D rats when treated with RVF (P<.05) and with HCS (P<.01), compared with the baseline values. Although HCS diet treatment very significantly lowered fed plasma insulin levels compared with NC diet treatment in G-K rats (P<.01), RVF diet treatment alone did not decrease plasma insulin levels. In contrast, there was no change of insulin levels in overweight aged S-D rats after either RVF or HCS diet treatment. Postfeeding glucose levels in G-K rats fed RVF or HCS significantly fell, compared with the rats fed NC (P<.05). Interestingly, fasting blood glucose levels in RVF- or HCS-fed rats were very significantly lower than in NC-fed rats (P<.001). There was no change of blood glucose levels in S-D rats due to treatments with different diet. In G-K rats, food intake did not decrease during the first 3 weeks but fell very significantly from the fifth to eighth weeks with RVF (P<.01) and HCS (P<.001) treatments in G-K rats. However, food intake reduction in aged S-D rats was shown only for the HCS-treated rat group (P<.05). Water intake slightly decreased in G-K rats with either RVF or HCS treatment (P<.05) but very significantly decreased in S-D rats with HCS treatment (P<.01). Body weight gain in young G-K rats and BW in aged S-D rats significantly decreased only when rats were treated with HCS diet (P<.05). These data suggest that regular consumption of HCS diet helps to control blood glucose metabolism in diabetic G-K rats and BW control in aged obese S-D rats.
环(组氨酸-脯氨酸)、控制能量饮食、大豆蛋白水解物(SPH)和生蔬菜食物(RVF)已知可改善胰岛素敏感性和体重(BW)控制。通过将SPH与溶解在70%乙醇中的1 N KH(2)CO(3)在室温下回流2周,提高了SPH中高环(组氨酸-脯氨酸)含量(HCS)。使用这种材料,我们研究了HCS加RVF对遗传性糖尿病Goto-Kakizaki(G-K)大鼠和胰岛素抵抗的老年超重Sprague-Dawley(S-D)大鼠葡萄糖代谢和体重控制的影响。将30只7周龄的G-K大鼠和18只16至18月龄的S-D大鼠分为3组,分别用正常饲料(NC)、RVF饮食或HCS饮食处理8周。生蔬菜食物饮食由1:3的RVF和2:3的NC组成;HCS饮食由1:27的HCS、8:27的RVF和2:3的NC组成。与基线值相比,RVF处理组(P<.01)和HCS处理组(P<.001)的G-K大鼠口服葡萄糖耐量均显著改善,而NC喂养组大鼠口服葡萄糖耐量恶化。同样,与基线值相比,老年超重S-D大鼠在接受RVF(P<.05)和HCS(P<.01)处理时,口服葡萄糖耐量也有所改善。尽管与NC饮食处理相比,HCS饮食处理使G-K大鼠的进食后血浆胰岛素水平非常显著降低(P<.01),但单独的RVF饮食处理并未降低血浆胰岛素水平。相比之下,超重老年S-D大鼠在接受RVF或HCS饮食处理后胰岛素水平没有变化。与NC喂养的大鼠相比,接受RVF或HCS喂养的G-K大鼠进食后血糖水平显著下降(P<.05)。有趣的是,RVF或HCS喂养的大鼠空腹血糖水平比NC喂养的大鼠非常显著降低(P<.001)。不同饮食处理对S-D大鼠的血糖水平没有影响。在G-K大鼠中,前3周食物摄入量没有减少,但在第5至8周,接受RVF(P<.01)和HCS(P<.001)处理的G-K大鼠食物摄入量非常显著下降。然而,老年S-D大鼠仅在HCS处理组出现食物摄入量减少(P<.05)。G-K大鼠接受RVF或HCS处理时水摄入量略有下降(P<.05),但老年S-D大鼠接受HCS处理时水摄入量非常显著下降(P<.01)。仅当大鼠接受HCS饮食处理时,年轻G-K大鼠的体重增加和老年S-D大鼠的体重才显著下降(P<.05)。这些数据表明,定期食用HCS饮食有助于控制糖尿病G-K大鼠的血糖代谢和老年肥胖S-D大鼠 的体重。