Pransky Glenn, Gatchel Robert, Linton Steven J, Loisel Patrick
Center for Disability Research, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Dec;15(4):453-7. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8027-y.
Despite considerable multidisciplinary research on return to work (RTW), there has been only modest progress in implementation of study results, and little change in overall rates of work disability in developed countries.
Thirty RTW researchers, representing over 20 institutions, assembled to review the current state of the art in RTW research, to identify promising areas for further development, and to provide direction for future investigations.
Six major themes were selected as priority areas: early risk prediction; psychosocial, behavioral and cognitive interventions; physical treatments; the challenge of implementing evidence in the workplace context; effective methods to engage multiple stakeholders; and identification of outcomes that are relevant to both RTW stakeholders and different phases of the RTW process. Understanding and preventing delayed RTW will require application of new concepts and study designs, better measures of determinants and outcomes, and more translational research. Greater stakeholder involvement and commitment, and methods to address the unique challenges of each situation are required.
尽管在重返工作岗位(RTW)方面进行了大量多学科研究,但研究结果的实施进展甚微,发达国家的工作残疾总体发生率几乎没有变化。
来自20多个机构的30名RTW研究人员齐聚一堂,回顾RTW研究的当前技术水平,确定有前景的进一步发展领域,并为未来研究提供方向。
六个主要主题被选为优先领域:早期风险预测;心理社会、行为和认知干预;物理治疗;在工作场所背景下实施证据的挑战;让多个利益相关者参与的有效方法;以及确定与RTW利益相关者和RTW过程不同阶段都相关的结果。理解和预防延迟RTW将需要应用新的概念和研究设计、更好地衡量决定因素和结果,以及更多的转化研究。需要利益相关者更多的参与和承诺,以及应对每种情况独特挑战的方法。