Bernstein D P, Lemmens H J M
Department of Anesthesiology, Palomar Medical Center, Escondido, CA, USA.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 Jul;43(4):443-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02344724.
The study's goal was to determine if cardiac output (CO), obtained by impedance cardiography (ICG), would be improved by a new equation N, implementing a square root transformation for dZ/dtmax/Z0, and a variable magnitude, mass-based volume conductor Vc. Pulmonary artery catheterisation was performed on 106 cardiac surgery patients pre-operatively. Post-operatively, thermodilution cardiac output (TDCO) was simultaneously compared with ICG CO. dZ/dtmax/Z0 and Z0 were obtained from a proprietary bioimpedance device. The impedance variables, in addition to left ventricular ejection time TLVE and patient height and weight, were input using four stroke volume (SV) equations: Kubicek (K), Sramek (S), Sramek-Bernstein (SB), and a new equation N. CO was calculated as SV x heart rate. Data are presented as mean +/- SD. One way repeated measures of ANOVA followed by the Tukey test were used for inter-group comparisons. Bland-Altman methods were used to assess bias, precision and limits of agreement. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. CO implementing N (6.06 +/- 1.48 l min(-1)) was not different from TDCO (5.97 +/- 1.41 l min(-1)). By contrast, CO calculated using K (3.70 +/- 1.53 l min(-1)), S (4.16 +/- 1.83 l min(-1)) and SB (4.37 +/- 1.82 l min(-1)) was significantly less than TDCO. Bland-Altman analysis showed poor agreement between TDCO and K, S and SB, but not between TDCO and N. Compared with TDCO, equation N, using a square-root transformation for dZ/dtmax/Z0, and a mass-based Vc, was superior to existing transthoracic impedance techniques for SV and CO determination.
该研究的目的是确定通过阻抗心动图(ICG)获得的心输出量(CO)是否会因新方程N而得到改善,该方程对dZ/dtmax/Z0进行平方根变换,并采用可变大小、基于质量的容积导体Vc。对106例心脏手术患者术前进行肺动脉导管插入术。术后,将热稀释法心输出量(TDCO)与ICG CO同时进行比较。dZ/dtmax/Z0和Z0由一台专利生物阻抗设备获得。除左心室射血时间TLVE以及患者身高和体重外,阻抗变量通过四个每搏输出量(SV)方程输入:库比克(K)、斯拉梅克(S)、斯拉梅克 - 伯恩斯坦(SB)以及新方程N。CO计算为SV×心率。数据以平均值±标准差表示。采用单因素重复测量方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验用于组间比较。采用Bland - Altman方法评估偏差、精密度和一致性界限。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。采用方程N计算的CO(6.06±1.48升/分钟)与TDCO(5.97±1.41升/分钟)无差异。相比之下,采用K(3.70±1.53升/分钟)、S(4.16±1.83升/分钟)和SB(4.37±1.82升/分钟)计算的CO显著低于TDCO。Bland - Altman分析显示TDCO与K、S和SB之间一致性较差,但TDCO与N之间一致性良好。与TDCO相比,方程N对dZ/dtmax/Z0进行平方根变换并采用基于质量的Vc,在SV和CO测定方面优于现有的经胸阻抗技术。