• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响速度编码相位成像准确性和精确性的因素。

Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity-encoded phase imaging.

作者信息

Buonocore M H, Bogren H

机构信息

Division of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 1992 Jul;26(1):141-54. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910260115.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.1910260115
PMID:1625560
Abstract

Velocity-encoded phase contrast imaging is being used increasingly in clinical imaging for quantization of blood flow. In this study, the accuracy and precision of ascending aorta flow measurements were found to depend on several subtle aspects of the scan prescription and image analysis. While the usual scan parameters such as TR, TE, and flip angle gave incremental changes in the flow measurements, four additional factors that had a much greater effect on the measurements were identified. These factors were (1) the zero velocity (background) pixel value, (2) the size and shape of the vessel region of interest, (3) the maximum velocity encoded in diastole, and (4) the temporal resolution. Statistical analysis was done on a total of 48 scans on nine normal subjects to confirm the significance of the measured differences using the various choices for each of these factors. These factors must be considered if accurate and precise measurements of blood flow are desired. Estimates of accuracy and precision suggest that quantitative flow measurements from velocity-encoded MR imaging can be clinically useful.

摘要

速度编码相位对比成像在临床成像中越来越多地用于血流定量分析。在本研究中,发现升主动脉血流测量的准确性和精确性取决于扫描方案和图像分析的几个微妙方面。虽然诸如重复时间(TR)、回波时间(TE)和翻转角等常用扫描参数在血流测量中会产生增量变化,但还确定了另外四个对测量有更大影响的因素。这些因素包括:(1)零速度(背景)像素值;(2)感兴趣血管区域的大小和形状;(3)舒张期编码的最大速度;(4)时间分辨率。对9名正常受试者的48次扫描进行了统计分析,以确认使用这些因素中每个因素的不同选择所测得差异的显著性。如果需要准确和精确的血流测量,就必须考虑这些因素。准确性和精确性的估计表明,速度编码磁共振成像的定量血流测量在临床上可能是有用的。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity-encoded phase imaging.影响速度编码相位成像准确性和精确性的因素。
Magn Reson Med. 1992 Jul;26(1):141-54. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910260115.
2
Blood flow measurement using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval.
Magn Reson Med. 1993 Jun;29(6):790-5. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910290611.
3
Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation.利用相位对比磁共振成像进行心血管血流测量:基本原理与实施方法
Radiographics. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):651-71. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651.
4
Real-time phase-contrast MRI of cardiovascular blood flow using undersampled radial fast low-angle shot and nonlinear inverse reconstruction.应用欠采样径向快速小角度激发和非线性逆重建技术的心血管血流实时相位对比 MRI。
NMR Biomed. 2012 Jul;25(7):917-24. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1812. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
5
Estimation of total coronary artery flow using measurements of flow in the ascending aorta.
Magn Reson Med. 1994 Nov;32(5):602-11. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320509.
6
Rapid velocity-encoded cine imaging with turbo-BRISK.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999;1(3):223-32. doi: 10.3109/10976649909088334.
7
Effect of acquisition parameters on the accuracy of velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging blood flow measurements.采集参数对速度编码电影磁共振成像血流测量准确性的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Jan;15(1):47-54. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10029.
8
Real-time Fourier velocity encoding: an in vivo evaluation.实时傅里叶速度编码:一项体内评估
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Mar;21(3):297-304. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20266.
9
Magnetic resonance blood flow mapping in ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病中的磁共振血流成像
Rays. 1999 Jan-Mar;24(1):109-18.
10
Measurement of systolic and diastolic arterial wall shear stress in the ascending aorta.升主动脉收缩期和舒张期动脉壁剪切应力的测量。
Phys Med. 2008 Dec;24(4):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Splanchnic flow analysis in 4D flow MRI: scan-rescan reproducibility of flow and image quality.4D 血流磁共振成像中的内脏血流分析:血流和图像质量的扫描 - 重扫可重复性
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Oct 15. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05238-7.
2
Free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow quantification can be an alternative to standard breath-holding approach.自由呼吸心血管磁共振血流定量可作为标准屏气方法的替代方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 20;15(1):20188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06126-2.
3
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.
心血管磁共振学会心血管磁共振参考值(“正常值”):2025年更新。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101853. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101853. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
Accelerated phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with use of resolution enhancement generative adversarial neural network.使用分辨率增强生成对抗神经网络的加速相位对比磁共振成像
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024 Nov 28;27(1):101128. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101128.
5
4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update.4D Flow 心血管磁共振共识声明:2023 更新版。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Jul 20;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z.
6
Importance of complex blood flow in the assessment of aortic regurgitation severity using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.相位对比磁共振成像评估主动脉瓣反流严重程度中复杂血流的重要性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Dec;37(12):3561-3572. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02341-w. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
7
Reliable phase-contrast flow volume magnetic resonance measurements are feasible without adjustment of the velocity encoding parameter.无需调整速度编码参数即可进行可靠的相位对比血流容积磁共振测量。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Nov;7(6):063502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.6.063502. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
On the optimal temporal resolution for phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: establishment of baseline values.相位对比心血管磁共振成像的最佳时间分辨率:基线值的确立。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Oct 5;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00669-1.
9
Assessing test-retest reliability of phase contrast MRI for measuring cerebrospinal fluid and cerebral blood flow dynamics.评估相位对比 MRI 测量脑脊液和脑血流动力学的重测信度。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Aug;82(2):658-670. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27752. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
4D flow MRI quantification of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: Reproducibility and consistency relative to conventional MRI.四维流磁共振成像定量评估二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流:与常规磁共振成像的可重复性和一致性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;48(4):1147-1158. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26040. Epub 2018 Apr 11.