Deng Daogui, Li Hongyuan, Hu Wanming, Zhou Qiong, Guo Longgen
State Key Laboratory for Freshwater Ecology and Biotechology, Donghu Experimental Station of Lake Ecosystem, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2005 Aug;16(8):1502-6.
The investigation on the distribution an d population density of C. fluminea and Bellamya sp. in Chaohu Lake during September 2001 and September 2002 showed that in the west region of the lake where was seriously eutrophic, the density and biomass of C. fluminea were 5.1 ind. x m(-2) and 17.87 g x m(-2) in 2001, and 8.8 ind. x m(-2) and 47.29 g x m(-2) in 2002, while those of Bellamya sp. were 13.3 ind. x m(-2) and 45.45 g x m(-2) in 2001, and 3.8 ind. x m(-2) and 12.56 g x m(-2) in 2002, respectively. In the east region of the lake where was eutrophic, the density and biomass of C. fluminea were 23.8 ind. x m(-2) and 67.86 g x m(-2) in 2001, and 29.2 ind. x m(-2) and 96.18 g x m(-2) in 2002, while those of Bellamya sp. were 10.1 ind. x m(-2) and 32.00 g x m(-2) in 2001, and 9.4 ind. x m(-2) and 31.21 g x m(-2) in 2002, respectively. The density and biomass of C. fluminea and Bellamya sp. were declined with increasing eutrophication. In hypertrophic region, C. fluminea and Bellamya sp. were absent. The density and biomass of the two species were obviously higher in littoral than in pelagic region. The distribution type of C. fluminea was core-model, while that of Bellamya sp. was random. The correlation between the density and biomass of C. fluminea and Bellamya sp. and water depth was not significant (P > 0.05). The biomass of Bellamya sp. was negatively correlated with water TN (P < 0.01), NO3-N (P < 0.05), TP(P < 0.01) and PO4-P (P < 0.05), while that of C. fluminea only had a significantly negative correlation with PO4-P(P < 0.05). Compared with 1981, there was fewer C. fluminea in the lake nowadays. The effects of other environmental factors on the population distribution and growth of C. fluminea and Bellamya sp. were also discussed.
2001年9月至2002年9月对巢湖褶纹冠蚌和环棱螺的分布及种群密度的调查显示,在湖泊严重富营养化的西部地区,2001年褶纹冠蚌的密度和生物量分别为5.1个/平方米和17.87克/平方米,2002年为8.8个/平方米和47.29克/平方米,而环棱螺的密度和生物量在2001年分别为13.3个/平方米和45.45克/平方米,2002年为3.8个/平方米和12.56克/平方米。在湖泊富营养化的东部地区,2001年褶纹冠蚌的密度和生物量分别为23.8个/平方米和67.86克/平方米,2002年为29.2个/平方米和96.18克/平方米,而环棱螺的密度和生物量在2001年分别为10.1个/平方米和32.00克/平方米,2002年为9.4个/平方米和31.21克/平方米。褶纹冠蚌和环棱螺的密度和生物量随着富营养化程度的增加而下降。在超富营养化区域,没有褶纹冠蚌和环棱螺。这两个物种的密度和生物量在沿岸带明显高于在敞水区。褶纹冠蚌的分布类型为核心型,而环棱螺的分布类型为随机型。褶纹冠蚌和环棱螺的密度和生物量与水深之间的相关性不显著(P>0.05)。环棱螺的生物量与水体总氮(P<0.01)、硝态氮(P<0.05)、总磷(P<0.01)和磷酸盐磷(P<0.05)呈负相关,而褶纹冠蚌的生物量仅与磷酸盐磷呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。与1981年相比,现在湖中褶纹冠蚌的数量减少。还讨论了其他环境因素对褶纹冠蚌和环棱螺种群分布和生长的影响。