Tillberg A, Berglund A, Mårell L, Bergdahl J, Eriksson N, Lindén G, Stenberg B, Widman L
Dental Materials Science, Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Sweden.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;33(6):427-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00240.x.
In Sweden, many patients with symptoms allegedly caused by their dental materials have exchanged their restorations, but the effects of the exchange have been insufficiently investigated. Therefore, the aim of the study was to describe the change in health over time for these patients and the hypothesis was that the patients could be divided based on their symptoms and that the ability to recover differs between these groups. Furthermore, we also examined if other factors such as replacement of dental restorative materials and follow-up time had any impact on the perceived health status.
A questionnaire was sent to 614 patients who had been referred to the School of Dentistry, Umeå, Sweden, with symptoms allegedly caused by dental restorative materials. The response rate was 55%.
The risk of having any further complaints was higher for patients with complex symptoms (P = 0.03) and these patients had exchanged their restorations to a significantly larger extent than the others (P = 0.03). The remaining complaints was more frequent among men (P = 0.02). Exchange of dental restorative materials had no significant impact on the ability to recover completely. However, the patients who had exchanged their restorations completely perceived a significantly larger alleviation of their symptoms than the others (P < 0.01), although the frequency of most of the symptoms had increased.
Patients with complex symptoms had a more unfavorable long-term prognosis concerning persistent complaints than those with localized symptoms only. Furthermore, the results indicate that the patients might experience health improvements after removal of their dental restorative materials. The reason for this improvement, however, is unclear. Further analyses regarding other possible explanations than the 'odontological/medical' are needed.
在瑞典,许多据称因牙科材料出现症状的患者更换了修复体,但更换修复体的效果尚未得到充分研究。因此,本研究的目的是描述这些患者健康状况随时间的变化,假设是患者可根据症状进行分组,且这些组之间的恢复能力存在差异。此外,我们还研究了其他因素,如牙科修复材料的更换和随访时间对感知健康状况是否有任何影响。
向614名因据称由牙科修复材料引起的症状而被转诊至瑞典于默奥牙科学院的患者发送了问卷。回复率为55%。
有复杂症状的患者出现进一步不适的风险更高(P = 0.03),且这些患者更换修复体的程度明显大于其他患者(P = 0.03)。男性中剩余不适更为常见(P = 0.02)。牙科修复材料的更换对完全康复的能力没有显著影响。然而,完全更换了修复体的患者虽然大多数症状的频率有所增加,但他们感觉症状缓解程度明显大于其他患者(P < 0.01)。
与仅出现局部症状的患者相比,有复杂症状的患者在持续不适方面的长期预后更差。此外,结果表明患者在去除牙科修复材料后健康状况可能会有所改善。然而,这种改善的原因尚不清楚。需要对除“牙科学/医学”之外的其他可能解释进行进一步分析。