Benoit D L, Dowling J J
University of Delaware, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Biomedical Research, Spencer Labs 126, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):352-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.07.006. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
The purpose of this study was to use an electromyography (EMG) based muscle model to investigate the performance enhancement of stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) tasks at different elbow flexion-extension velocities. A torque motor was used to oscillate the forearms of seven healthy male subjects (23-40 years) during SSC and non-SSC contractions at four frequencies of movement (.58, 1.5, 2.4 and 3.3Hz) over a range of 105 degrees -162 degrees of elbow extension. The torque was integrated as a function of joint angle to yield the work produced by the elbow flexors. The elbow flexors were transcutaneously stimulated with a voltage equivalent to 60% maximum voluntary isometric contraction torque for 4s at 50Hz. EMG of the elbow flexors and extensors was recorded from the biceps and triceps respectively. The processed EMG was used to drive a Hill based model to predict the torque of the elbow flexors. Results indicate that muscle work increases from non-SSC to SSC trials. Work decreases for SSC and non-SSC trials with increasing velocity. The simulated constant activation muscle model predicted work well for all trials and conditions, indicating muscle model accuracy. The EMG driven model predicted well for all non-SSC trials, but significantly underestimated the work for SSC tasks, suggesting that the contractile component is directly involved in optimising muscle work during SSC tasks.
本研究的目的是使用基于肌电图(EMG)的肌肉模型,来研究在不同的肘关节屈伸速度下,拉长-缩短周期(SSC)任务的性能增强情况。在105度至162度的肘关节伸展范围内,使用扭矩电机使7名健康男性受试者(23 - 40岁)的前臂在SSC和非SSC收缩过程中以四种运动频率(0.58、1.5、2.4和3.3Hz)进行摆动。扭矩作为关节角度的函数进行积分,以得出肘关节屈肌产生的功。用相当于最大自主等长收缩扭矩60%的电压,以50Hz对肘关节屈肌进行4秒的经皮刺激。分别从肱二头肌和肱三头肌记录肘关节屈肌和伸肌的肌电图。处理后的肌电图用于驱动基于希尔模型来预测肘关节屈肌的扭矩。结果表明,从非SSC试验到SSC试验,肌肉功增加。随着速度增加,SSC和非SSC试验中的功均降低。模拟的恒定激活肌肉模型在所有试验和条件下对功的预测都很好,表明肌肉模型的准确性。肌电图驱动模型对所有非SSC试验预测良好,但显著低估了SSC任务中的功,这表明收缩成分直接参与了优化SSC任务期间的肌肉功。