Suppr超能文献

无痛个体中前足、中足和后足静态对线关系。

The relationship between forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot static alignment in pain-free individuals.

作者信息

Buchanan Kirsten Rossner, Davis Irene

机构信息

Sports Medicine Dept, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Sep;35(9):559-66. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.9.559.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Correlational study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether, and to what degree, a relationship exists between forefoot angle and weight-bearing midfoot and rearfoot position.

BACKGROUND

There have been conflicting reports with regard to the degree to which the structure of the foot may influence the function. The influence of forefoot structure on weight-bearing midfoot and rearfoot position has not been extensively investigated.

METHODS AND MEASURES

Fifty-one healthy subjects participated in this study (26 male and 25 female). Forefoot angle was measured in prone as varus (positive numbers), neutral (0), or valgus (negative numbers). Navicular drop was measured from subtalar joint neutral to unilateral standing relaxed. Rearfoot angle was measured in relaxed single-limb stance as the angle between a line that bisected the calcaneus and a line that bisected the lower third of the leg. The relationships between forefoot angle and navicular drop, and between forefoot angle and relaxed rearfoot angle, were investigated. The same relationships were also investigated in the neutral forefoot subgroup when the sample was divided in 3 subgroups based on 1 standard deviation of forefoot angle.

RESULTS

There is a significant relationship between forefoot angle and relaxed rearfoot angle (r = 0.52, P < .001), as well as between forefoot angle and navicular drop (r = 0.55, P < .001), in the whole sample (n = 51). Average degrees of forefoot angle in the neutral subgroup (between 1.0 degree and 8 degrees of varus) are not associated with predictable positions of relaxed rearfoot angle (r = 0.19, P = .24) or navicular drop (r = 0.01, P = .96).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study, there is a significant relationship between forefoot angle and relaxed rearfoot angle, as well as between forefoot angle and navicular drop, in healthy subjects. These relationships were not found when forefoot varus values were within a standard deviation of the sample mean.

摘要

研究设计

相关性研究。

目的

确定前足角度与负重时中足和后足位置之间是否存在关系以及这种关系的程度。

背景

关于足部结构对功能的影响程度,存在相互矛盾的报道。前足结构对负重时中足和后足位置的影响尚未得到广泛研究。

方法与测量

51名健康受试者参与了本研究(26名男性和25名女性)。前足角度在俯卧位测量,内翻(正数)、中立(0)或外翻(负数)。舟骨下降从距下关节中立位测量至单腿站立放松位。后足角度在单腿放松站立位测量,为平分跟骨的线与平分小腿下三分之一的线之间的角度。研究了前足角度与舟骨下降之间以及前足角度与放松后足角度之间的关系。当根据前足角度的一个标准差将样本分为3个亚组时,在中立前足亚组中也研究了相同的关系。

结果

在整个样本(n = 51)中,前足角度与放松后足角度之间存在显著关系(r = 0.52,P <.001),前足角度与舟骨下降之间也存在显著关系(r = 0.55,P <.001)。中立亚组(内翻1.0度至8度之间)的前足角度平均度数与放松后足角度的可预测位置(r = 0.19,P =.24)或舟骨下降(r = 0.01,P =.96)无关。

结论

基于本研究结果,在健康受试者中,前足角度与放松后足角度之间以及前足角度与舟骨下降之间存在显著关系。当前足内翻值在样本均值的一个标准差范围内时,未发现这些关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验