Bergh Ingrid, Jakobsson Eva, Sjöström Björn, Steen Bertil
School of Life Sciences, University of Skövde, Sweden.
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Nov;52(4):351-9; discussion 360-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03607.x.
The aim of this study was to examine how older patients who had undergone hip surgery described their experience of pain.
A verbal report of pain is considered to be the single most reliable indicator of a person's pain experience. When assessing pain, healthcare professionals must be able to interpret the content of pain reports in order to understand older patient's pain experiences.
The study was carried out in two orthopaedic and two elder care wards in a large university hospital in Sweden in 2000. Altogether, 38 patients with hip replacement (mean age = 75) and 22 patients with hip fracture (mean age = 81) took part. A face-to-face interview was conducted with each patient on the second day after operation. Data were transcribed and analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis.
Participants expressed their pain in a nuanced and detailed way in everyday language. Four main themes with sub-themes emerged: (a) objectification (localizing; quantifying; characterizing; temporalizing); (b) compensating (substitution; picturing); (c) explaining (functionalizing pain and its relief; externalizing pain and its relief); (d) existentializing (present pain orientation; future pain orientation).
Exploring the ways older patients talk about pain is expected to result in a better understanding of the older patient's need of empathic individualized care and in the optimization of pain management.
本研究旨在探讨接受髋关节手术的老年患者如何描述他们的疼痛体验。
疼痛的口头报告被认为是一个人疼痛体验的最可靠指标。在评估疼痛时,医疗保健专业人员必须能够解读疼痛报告的内容,以便了解老年患者的疼痛体验。
2000年,在瑞典一家大型大学医院的两个骨科病房和两个老年护理病房进行了这项研究。共有38例髋关节置换患者(平均年龄 = 75岁)和22例髋部骨折患者(平均年龄 = 81岁)参与。在术后第二天对每位患者进行了面对面访谈。使用描述性定性内容分析法对数据进行转录和分析。
参与者用日常语言细致且详细地表达了他们的疼痛。出现了四个主要主题及子主题:(a)客观化(定位;量化;描述特征;确定时间);(b)补偿(替代;想象);(c)解释(将疼痛及其缓解功能化;将疼痛及其缓解外在化);(d)存在化(当前疼痛取向;未来疼痛取向)。
探索老年患者谈论疼痛的方式,有望更好地理解老年患者对共情个体化护理的需求,并优化疼痛管理。