Suppr超能文献

时间定向的注意机制:决定因素与属性

The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: determinants and attributes.

作者信息

Correa Angel, Lupiáñez Juan, Tudela Pío

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología Experimental y Fisiología del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, Campus Universitario de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2006 Feb;169(1):58-68. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0131-x. Epub 2005 Nov 5.

Abstract

A review of traditional research on preparation and foreperiod has identified strategic (endogenous) and automatic (exogenous) factors probably involved in endogenous temporal-orienting experiments, such as the type of task, the way by which temporal expectancy is manipulated, the probability of target occurrence and automatic sequential effects, yet their combined impact had not been investigated. These factors were manipulated within the same temporal-orienting procedure, in which a temporal cue indicated that the target could appear after an interval of either 400 or 1,400 ms. We observed faster reaction times for validly versus invalidly cued targets, that is, endogenous temporal-orienting effects. The main results were that the probability of target occurrence (catch-trial proportion) modulated temporal orienting, such that the attentional effects at the short interval were independent of catch trials, whereas at the long interval the effects were only observed when catch trials were present. In contrast, the interval duration of the previous trial (i.e., exogenous sequential effects) did not influence endogenous temporal orienting. A flexible and endogenous mechanism of attentional orienting in time can account for these results. Despite the contribution of other factors, the use of predictive temporal cues was sufficient to yield attentional facilitation based on temporal expectancy.

摘要

一项关于准备和前间隔的传统研究综述指出,在内源性时间定向实验中可能涉及策略性(内源性)和自动性(外源性)因素,比如任务类型、操纵时间预期的方式、目标出现的概率以及自动序列效应,但它们的综合影响尚未得到研究。在同一时间定向程序中对这些因素进行了操纵,其中一个时间线索表明目标可能在400毫秒或1400毫秒的间隔后出现。我们观察到,对于有效提示目标与无效提示目标,反应时间更快,即内源性时间定向效应。主要结果是,目标出现的概率(捕捉试验比例)调节了时间定向,使得在短间隔时的注意效应与捕捉试验无关,而在长间隔时,只有当存在捕捉试验时才会观察到这种效应。相比之下,前一次试验的间隔持续时间(即外源性序列效应)并未影响内源性时间定向。一种灵活的内源性时间注意定向机制可以解释这些结果。尽管有其他因素的作用,但使用预测性时间线索足以基于时间预期产生注意促进作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验