Artuso Elisabetta, Stomaci Berardino, Verlato Roberto, Turrini Pietro, Lafisca Nicolò, Baccillieri Maria Stella, Di Marco Attilio, Piovesana Piergiuseppe
Department of Cardiology, P. Cosma Hospital, Camposampiero (PD), Italy.
Ital Heart J. 2005 Jul;6(7):595-600.
Ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of pulmonary veins (PVs) is a promising invasive approach for the non-pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation, but PV stenosis has been reported as a possible complication of this intervention. The aim of this study was to assess PV anatomy and stenosis (i.e. number and progression) by means of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during the follow-up of patients undergoing RFCA.
Twenty-three consecutive patients with refractory and highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation underwent ostial radiofrequency isolation of arrhythmogenic triggers/foci, localized into the PVs, by an electroanatomic approach (CARTO system) or circular mapping with a multipolar catheter (LASSO) placed under radioscopic guidance. All patients were investigated using TEE and magnetic resonance angiography before radiofrequency application to evaluate PV anatomy. TEE examination was repeated after 2 months of follow-up and, in the presence of a stenosis, 1 year later.
TEE allowed to identify 100% of the left and right superior PVs, 96% of right inferior PVs, and 74% of the left inferior PVs. Anatomic variants were detected at TEE in 33% of patients against 37% at magnetic resonance angiography (95% of concordance). After ostial RFCA, TEE disclosed a significant reduction in the mean diameters of the left superior PV (14.1 +/- 3.2 vs 12.0 +/- 2.7 mm, p < 0.01), left inferior PV (11.2 +/- 2.3 vs 9.8 +/- 2.2 mm, p = 0.05) and right superior PV (14.2 +/- 2.6 vs 12.9 +/- 2.7 mm, p < 0.05), and an increase in the mean peak velocities of the left superior PV (69.8 +/- 14.8 vs 91 +/- 42.4 cm/s, p < 0.05) and left inferior PV (59.2 +/- 18.1 vs 79.3 +/- 40.5 cm/s, p < 0.05). From a total of 88 PVs treated, 7 (7.9%) showed a higher significant stenosis in patients treated using the LASSO than the CARTO system (31.3 vs 2.8% respectively, p < 0.01). After 1-year follow-up there was no progression of PV stenosis.
TEE was successful to evaluate PV anatomy and stenosis of patients undergoing ostial RFCA for atrial fibrillation. This complication is not rare and seems to be strictly related to the method of ablation, in particular when circular mapping and disconnection of triggers/foci was carried out by only a circular multipolar catheter without an electroanatomic approach.
肺静脉口部射频导管消融术(RFCA)是一种有前景的用于房颤非药物治疗的侵入性方法,但肺静脉狭窄已被报道为该干预措施可能的并发症。本研究的目的是在接受RFCA患者的随访期间,通过经食管超声心动图(TEE)评估肺静脉解剖结构和狭窄情况(即数量和进展)。
连续23例难治性且症状严重的房颤患者通过电解剖方法(CARTO系统)或在X线透视引导下放置多极导管(LASSO)进行环状标测,对位于肺静脉内的致心律失常触发灶/起源点进行口部射频隔离。所有患者在进行射频治疗前均使用TEE和磁共振血管造影来评估肺静脉解剖结构。随访2个月后重复进行TEE检查,若存在狭窄,则在1年后再次检查。
TEE能够识别100%的左右上肺静脉、96%的右下肺静脉以及74%的左下肺静脉。33%的患者在TEE检查时发现解剖变异,而磁共振血管造影检查时这一比例为37%(一致性为95%)。口部RFCA术后,TEE显示左上肺静脉平均直径显著减小(14.1±3.2 vs 12.0±2.7mm,p<0.01),左下肺静脉(11.2±2.3 vs 9.8±2.2mm,p=0.05)和右上肺静脉(14.2±2.6 vs 12.9±2.7mm,p<0.05),并且左上肺静脉(69.8±14.8 vs 91±42.4cm/s,p<0.05)和左下肺静脉(59.2±18.1 vs 79.3±40.5cm/s,p<0.05)的平均峰值流速增加。在总共88条接受治疗的肺静脉中,7条(7.9%)显示使用LASSO系统治疗的患者肺静脉狭窄程度明显高于使用CARTO系统的患者(分别为31.3%和2.8%,p<0.01)。1年随访后肺静脉狭窄没有进展。
TEE成功评估了接受口部RFCA治疗房颤患者的肺静脉解剖结构和狭窄情况。这种并发症并不罕见,似乎与消融方法密切相关,特别是当仅通过环状多极导管进行环状标测和触发灶/起源点切断而未采用电解剖方法时。