McCluskey Anthony G, Boyd Marie, Ross Susan C, Cosimo Emilio, Clark Anne Marie, Angerson Wilson J, Gaze Mark N, Mairs Robert J
Targeted Therapy Group and Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow, Cancer Research UK Beatson Laboratories.
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 1;11(21):7929-37. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0982.
Both [(131)I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine ([(131)I]MIBG) and the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan are effective as single-agent treatments of neuroblastoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of [(131)I]MIBG in combination with topotecan in vitro and in vivo.
The cell lines used were SK-N-BE(2c) (human neuroblastoma) and UVW/NAT (glioma cell line transfected with the noradrenaline transporter gene). Three different treatment schedules were assessed: topotecan given before (schedule 1), after (schedule 2), or simultaneously (schedule 3) with [(131)I]MIBG. DNA strand breakage was evaluated by comet assay, and cytotoxicity was determined by clonogenic survival. Efficacy was also measured by growth delay of tumor xenografts in nude mice.
Combination schedules 2 and 3 caused more cytotoxicity than schedule 1. Similarly, significant DNA damage was observed following treatment schedules 2 and 3 (P < 0.005) but not schedule 1. The mean number of days for a doubling in volume of SK-N-BE(2c) tumors and a 10-fold increase in volume of UVW/NAT tumors were 10.4 and 18.6 (untreated), 19.7 and 25.3 (topotecan alone), 22.8 and 31.9 ([(131)I]MIBG alone), 26.3 and 37.1 (combination schedule 1), 34.3 and 49.7 (combination schedule 2), and 53.2 and >71 (combination schedule 3), respectively. The highest rate of cure of both xenografts was observed following treatment with combination schedule 3.
The combination of topotecan and [(131)I]MIBG compared with either treatment alone gave rise to greater than additive DNA damage, clonogenic cell kill, and tumor growth delay. These effects were dependent on the scheduling of the two agents.
[(131)I]间碘苄胍([(131)I]MIBG)和拓扑异构酶I抑制剂拓扑替康作为神经母细胞瘤的单药治疗均有效。本研究的目的是在体外和体内研究[(131)I]MIBG与拓扑替康联合使用的疗效。
使用的细胞系为SK-N-BE(2c)(人神经母细胞瘤)和UVW/NAT(转染去甲肾上腺素转运体基因的胶质瘤细胞系)。评估了三种不同的治疗方案:拓扑替康在[(131)I]MIBG之前(方案1)、之后(方案2)或同时(方案3)给药。通过彗星试验评估DNA链断裂情况,并通过克隆形成存活率确定细胞毒性。还通过裸鼠体内肿瘤异种移植的生长延迟来衡量疗效。
联合方案2和3比方案1引起更多的细胞毒性。同样,在方案2和3治疗后观察到显著的DNA损伤(P < 0.005),而方案1未观察到。SK-N-BE(2c)肿瘤体积加倍和UVW/NAT肿瘤体积增加10倍的平均天数分别为10.4和18.6(未治疗)、19.7和25.3(单独使用拓扑替康)、22.8和31.9(单独使用[(131)I]MIBG)、26.3和37.1(联合方案1)、34.3和49.7(联合方案2)以及53.2和>71(联合方案3)。在用联合方案3治疗后,两种异种移植的治愈率最高。
与单独使用任何一种治疗相比,拓扑替康和[(131)I]MIBG联合使用导致的DNA损伤、克隆细胞杀伤和肿瘤生长延迟大于相加效应。这些效应取决于两种药物的给药顺序。