Lundahl Brad, Risser Heather J, Lovejoy M Christine
College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Jan;26(1):86-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
A meta-analysis of 63 peer-reviewed studies evaluated the ability of parent training programs to modify disruptive child behaviors and parental behavior and perceptions. This analysis extends previous work by directly comparing behavioral and nonbehavioral programs, evaluating follow-up effects, isolating dependent variables expressly targeted by parent training, and examining moderators. Effects immediately following treatment for behavioral and nonbehavioral programs were small to moderate. For nonbehavioral programs, insufficient studies precluded examining follow-up effects. For behavioral programs, follow-up effects were small in magnitude. Parent training was least effective for economically disadvantaged families; importantly, such families benefited significantly more from individually delivered parent training compared to group delivery. Including children in their own therapy, separate from parent training, did not enhance outcomes.
一项对63项同行评审研究的荟萃分析评估了家长培训项目改变儿童破坏性行为以及家长行为和认知的能力。该分析通过直接比较行为项目和非行为项目、评估随访效果、分离家长培训明确针对的因变量以及检查调节因素,扩展了先前的研究工作。行为项目和非行为项目治疗后的即时效果为小到中等。对于非行为项目,由于研究不足,无法检查随访效果。对于行为项目,随访效果幅度较小。家长培训对经济弱势家庭效果最差;重要的是,与集体授课相比,这类家庭从单独提供的家长培训中获益显著更多。让孩子接受独立于家长培训的自身治疗,并不会提高治疗效果。